It's funny how all talk of Schwab etc disappeared when it was clear all these institutions were on the side of higher births.
How dare they. Speaking of whihc, how does the future look with your 0 births side?
Now every conspiracy is just the nebulous "Jewish cabal",
But now you're talking to me. So stop whining about people whom I also don't like. It doesn't justify your own earth-shattering level of stupid. I'm pretty sure that none of these Stormfags is going to commit a shooting. I don't know the same of you.
Didn't you claim that the Roman Empire fell because of a bachelor tax? So if this predated Stalin by about 1500 years, how can it be a Stalinist policy? Did "Arcadian policy" sound less scary?
Fact is, there are not enough births. You oppose any attempt to do anything about it, even when the birth rate is < 1 per woman, as in Korea. You called the Korean a president a TRAITOR because he tried to increase birhts by ways other than righteous bachelor taxes. So how is that not opposing births? What is your solution?
Klaus Schwab is bringing the BACHELOR TAX and ENFORCED MONOGAMY to whatever country you've fled to. Har har har.
It's funny how all talk of Schwab etc disappeared when it was clear all these institutions were on the side of higher births.
Now every conspiracy is just the nebulous "Jewish cabal", which changes form based on which retard is typing.
How dare they. Speaking of whihc, how does the future look with your 0 births side?
But now you're talking to me. So stop whining about people whom I also don't like. It doesn't justify your own earth-shattering level of stupid. I'm pretty sure that none of these Stormfags is going to commit a shooting. I don't know the same of you.
There's a difference between opposing forcing parenthood with financial penalties and opposing birth in general.
One is opposing a policy of Stalinist ideals, and one is paid lunacy to make Elon Musk look sane.
Didn't you claim that the Roman Empire fell because of a bachelor tax? So if this predated Stalin by about 1500 years, how can it be a Stalinist policy? Did "Arcadian policy" sound less scary?
Fact is, there are not enough births. You oppose any attempt to do anything about it, even when the birth rate is < 1 per woman, as in Korea. You called the Korean a president a TRAITOR because he tried to increase birhts by ways other than righteous bachelor taxes. So how is that not opposing births? What is your solution?