It's funny how all talk of Schwab etc disappeared when it was clear all these institutions were on the side of higher births.
How dare they. Speaking of whihc, how does the future look with your 0 births side?
Now every conspiracy is just the nebulous "Jewish cabal",
But now you're talking to me. So stop whining about people whom I also don't like. It doesn't justify your own earth-shattering level of stupid. I'm pretty sure that none of these Stormfags is going to commit a shooting. I don't know the same of you.
Didn't you claim that the Roman Empire fell because of a bachelor tax? So if this predated Stalin by about 1500 years, how can it be a Stalinist policy? Did "Arcadian policy" sound less scary?
Fact is, there are not enough births. You oppose any attempt to do anything about it, even when the birth rate is < 1 per woman, as in Korea. You called the Korean a president a TRAITOR because he tried to increase birhts by ways other than righteous bachelor taxes. So how is that not opposing births? What is your solution?
If an ideology has been dead for over a thousand years, you attribute it to those who revived it. And pointing out it came from Stalin is valid, because the moment he died, they repealed all the Family Edicts.
Why are there not enough? Every day we hear AI is taking jobs. A lower population seems logical.
He was a traitor. He promised to do something about feminism and didn't. Instead, he emboldened them massively by basically admitting that the country will bow to them no matter what. It's no surprise men in Korea hate women. They spend two years in the army while women spend it in college, get out and are immediately screwed in the job market because they're two years behind. You really want to fix the birth rate? Put women on the conscription list. They'll rush to get pregnant to avoid doing anything that approaches hard work.
My solution is that a solution isn't needed. Free markets always stabilize. Women will push too far, run out of suckers, and pull back out of necessity. If there are interventions to force more support into the market, pushing an already overvalued asset even higher...it's always going to end in tears.
It's funny how all talk of Schwab etc disappeared when it was clear all these institutions were on the side of higher births.
Now every conspiracy is just the nebulous "Jewish cabal", which changes form based on which retard is typing.
How dare they. Speaking of whihc, how does the future look with your 0 births side?
But now you're talking to me. So stop whining about people whom I also don't like. It doesn't justify your own earth-shattering level of stupid. I'm pretty sure that none of these Stormfags is going to commit a shooting. I don't know the same of you.
There's a difference between opposing forcing parenthood with financial penalties and opposing birth in general.
One is opposing a policy of Stalinist ideals, and one is paid lunacy to make Elon Musk look sane.
Didn't you claim that the Roman Empire fell because of a bachelor tax? So if this predated Stalin by about 1500 years, how can it be a Stalinist policy? Did "Arcadian policy" sound less scary?
Fact is, there are not enough births. You oppose any attempt to do anything about it, even when the birth rate is < 1 per woman, as in Korea. You called the Korean a president a TRAITOR because he tried to increase birhts by ways other than righteous bachelor taxes. So how is that not opposing births? What is your solution?
If an ideology has been dead for over a thousand years, you attribute it to those who revived it. And pointing out it came from Stalin is valid, because the moment he died, they repealed all the Family Edicts.
Why are there not enough? Every day we hear AI is taking jobs. A lower population seems logical.
He was a traitor. He promised to do something about feminism and didn't. Instead, he emboldened them massively by basically admitting that the country will bow to them no matter what. It's no surprise men in Korea hate women. They spend two years in the army while women spend it in college, get out and are immediately screwed in the job market because they're two years behind. You really want to fix the birth rate? Put women on the conscription list.
They'll rush to get pregnant to avoid doing anything that approaches hard work.My solution is that a solution isn't needed. Free markets always stabilize. Women will push too far, run out of suckers, and pull back out of necessity. If there are interventions to force more support into the market, pushing an already overvalued asset even higher...it's always going to end in tears.