Most European countries make it illegal to track demographics for census purposes by race. Instead, Europe uses "nationality". In most European countries if you are a German citizen, then you are considered German for census purposes and then people extrapolate from German that they are White but this is false. A Nigerian who immigrates to Germany and has kids with another Nigerian whose kids are considered German will be considered German for all census tracking and thus anyone extrapolating the statistics as German = White will falsibly designate a black person as White.
This happens in every European country.
So, when people say Europe is more White than the USA, they are mistaken.
I used Grok is extrapolate the data since the 1960s looking at immigration data, birth rates, death rates, etc....and it concluded only 80% of Western Europe is White; however, this was a very rudamentary ask with parameters not well set. It seemed to include mixed as White and it used the total birth rate rather than discerning for immigrant birth rate being higher than non-immigrant, etc...
Point is that Western Europe is probably in the 70-80% range for total White population which is actually not much different than the USA. The non-White immigrants to Europe are exceptionally worse quality than the non-White immigrants to the USA.
London is basically 50% White now.
Europeans suggesting their non-White issue isn't as bad as the USA are coping. The USA is taking preventive action now while Europeans leaders want to destroy White people in Europe even further. Without course correction, in a decade, Europe will be worse than the USA.
Correct.
Source: I live in Europe.
Well then Source: You don't live in the US so it's really hard to say. I'm going to go out on a limb and say the somalians, jeets, blacks, and muslims infesting all our countries are pretty comparably terrible.
It is hard to say. However, I'm basing it on the simple observation that Mexicans are pretty great compared to Turks, Pakistanis and Algerians. They work, they're Christian and they're not nearly as criminal.
Citation needed.
lol no; not even close
All of them are illegal. They break the law every single day, dozens of times They steal welfare and social services from white pockets. They breed like rats.
They differ in no way, shape, or form. They are not white and never will be. They killed off all their whites in their dozens of civil wars.
Citation is that even the illegals come there to work. Illegals here come to rape and commit crimes.
OK, guy who doesn't know that Mexico is like 97% Catholic. Or are you one of those weirdos who thinks that Catholics are not Christian and that only your dispensationalist cult is?
I mean, you may think that Mexicans are illegal because you don't like them, but it's just an undisputed fact that under current US law, most of them are not illegal immigrants.
We're talking about how they compare to immigrants in Europe, not your eccentric notions about history.
This is the kinda thing that makes nationalists looks stupid.
Heres a fact. White people are genetically predisposed to create functioning society, perhaps even uniquely so (id even say probably)
Thats a pretty racist opinion. You can hold that, while still recognizing that most mexo-latin-etcs are not illegal, and that they are infinitely preferable to nogs and jeets.
If I could replace all of the latter with the former id do it in a heartbeat.
That's a completely separate opinion from the idea that America should be 90%+ white.
If we want to get real gritty with it, a large population of Mexicans is probably less detrimental than a large population of east Asians is, assuming a sane immigration policy. Mexicans integrate better, even if Asians contribute more broadly.
It's hard to say. American blacks behave worse than just about any immigrant population we get in large numbers, and Europe lacked a population like that before the invasion. That makes the relative difference between White Europeans and the migrants stand out more.