I mean, maybe, but how does this compare to the a hypothetical remake?
It feels more like the original works are the wedding cake, and bad remakes are a steaming pile of shit a week later. After all, any new movie is being made years later, so there’s no reason you have to put them next to each other.
The wedding cake existed, and was delicious. You even took some home and put it in the freezer and you can enjoy it later. A week later you see a steaming pile of shit. Now, realistically, what do you do?
A - Complain about the presence of the shit, and declare that the delicious wedding cake you had a week ago is now ruined because someone took a big steaming pile of shit on a plate and offered it to you to eat today
B - Say “gross,” and turn to go eat something else.
Me, personally, I’d choose B. A lot less stress in the soul over something unnecessary
Frankly, though, if anything, the wedding cake looks a lot more appetizing now.
You just said "maybe" a wedding cake is less appetizing when it's next to a steaming pile of shit.
That's all I needed to hear, frankly, to know exactly what you are.
so there’s no reason you have to put them next to each other.
Yes there is. Because right now they're being sold next to each other, in the same store, and if you buy one you're giving money to the other.
Now, realistically, what do you do?
You shout down, shoot down, and shut down the people who keep shitting on everything. You make it as loud and as public as possible, so that the shitters know that they won't go unnoticed and unchallenged. And you do that because you want to create a climate where things stop being shit on by shitters like you.
Nonparticipation is insufficient. Nevermind the likes of you, who are an active apologist and participant in the enshittening.
Of course it does. That's the whole point, and that's why you're defending it.
How does it take away from it? Will you enjoy the current book less knowing that a bad retelling exists?
Does a wedding cake get less appetizing when it's next to a steaming pile of shit?
Of course it does.
You know it does. That's why you're defending the defilement. Liberals lie like breathing. If you're talking, you're lying.
I mean, maybe, but how does this compare to the a hypothetical remake?
It feels more like the original works are the wedding cake, and bad remakes are a steaming pile of shit a week later. After all, any new movie is being made years later, so there’s no reason you have to put them next to each other.
The wedding cake existed, and was delicious. You even took some home and put it in the freezer and you can enjoy it later. A week later you see a steaming pile of shit. Now, realistically, what do you do?
A - Complain about the presence of the shit, and declare that the delicious wedding cake you had a week ago is now ruined because someone took a big steaming pile of shit on a plate and offered it to you to eat today
B - Say “gross,” and turn to go eat something else.
Me, personally, I’d choose B. A lot less stress in the soul over something unnecessary
Frankly, though, if anything, the wedding cake looks a lot more appetizing now.
You just said "maybe" a wedding cake is less appetizing when it's next to a steaming pile of shit.
That's all I needed to hear, frankly, to know exactly what you are.
Yes there is. Because right now they're being sold next to each other, in the same store, and if you buy one you're giving money to the other.
You shout down, shoot down, and shut down the people who keep shitting on everything. You make it as loud and as public as possible, so that the shitters know that they won't go unnoticed and unchallenged. And you do that because you want to create a climate where things stop being shit on by shitters like you.
Nonparticipation is insufficient. Nevermind the likes of you, who are an active apologist and participant in the enshittening.