Yeah, their knee jerk reaction will be to take what they want directly. Shoplifting will skyrocket further, break-ins, robberies, mugging, and squatting will hit levels that make Gotham City look like Martha's Vineyard. Liberals who support them will fume, march, demonstrate, donate, and tie up local government function. Everything will drag on and on and they'll blame white hate the whole time.
Majority of violent crime is done by men, majority of welfare abuse by women. If you take away the welfare, the women aren't going to pick up a knife and start mugging people on the streets. I'm sure more will try to shoplift from the nearby walmart.
Also, many who would potentially commit crime already were doing so anyway.
So yeah, if this did happen, I'm sure a few would resort to crime. Some would just stay but at least we aren't wasting tax dollars. Some would go back.
Definitely worth it if the government actually wanted to do something to benefit Americans, which they don't appear to.
Why the hell would they go back? No one would want to live in a sheetmetal and scrap shack. No one want to live in a nation without running water. What possible reason would they have to go back? The will just take even more under the table jobs and undercut Whites EVEN MORE. They have to learn FEAR. THEY HAVE TO BE MORE AFRAID OF WHITES THAN THEY ARE OF THE CARTELS.
YOU FUCKING RETARDED BOOMERS ARE GOING TO BE THE DEATH OF US ALL.
YOU FUCKING RETARDED BOOMERS ARE GOING TO BE THE DEATH OF US ALL.
Did you forget to take your crazy pills and lose track of what the conversation is even about? Are you arguing that we should keep giving them those benefits?
The will just take even more under the table jobs and undercut Whites EVEN MORE.
Maybe you actually are. You're too off your meds to actually tell.
All I said was,
The ones who would commit crimes are likely already doing so anyway so the increase may not be as large as you think.
Some will go back, some won't.
It's definitely worth cutting the benefits.
I never said that those were the only things that we should do, and I never said that alone would be sufficient to solve the problem.
You can argue that some going back in #2 is optimistic, but they still have allegiance/ties to their countries and some places in latin america are much more livable than others.
Yeah, their knee jerk reaction will be to take what they want directly. Shoplifting will skyrocket further, break-ins, robberies, mugging, and squatting will hit levels that make Gotham City look like Martha's Vineyard. Liberals who support them will fume, march, demonstrate, donate, and tie up local government function. Everything will drag on and on and they'll blame white hate the whole time.
It may be worth it, but they won't go quietly.
Good, treat them like a hostile foreign entity and escort them out with the National Guard
Good, they will out themselves and make it easier to deport
Majority of violent crime is done by men, majority of welfare abuse by women. If you take away the welfare, the women aren't going to pick up a knife and start mugging people on the streets. I'm sure more will try to shoplift from the nearby walmart.
Also, many who would potentially commit crime already were doing so anyway.
So yeah, if this did happen, I'm sure a few would resort to crime. Some would just stay but at least we aren't wasting tax dollars. Some would go back.
Definitely worth it if the government actually wanted to do something to benefit Americans, which they don't appear to.
Why the hell would they go back? No one would want to live in a sheetmetal and scrap shack. No one want to live in a nation without running water. What possible reason would they have to go back? The will just take even more under the table jobs and undercut Whites EVEN MORE. They have to learn FEAR. THEY HAVE TO BE MORE AFRAID OF WHITES THAN THEY ARE OF THE CARTELS.
YOU FUCKING RETARDED BOOMERS ARE GOING TO BE THE DEATH OF US ALL.
Did you forget to take your crazy pills and lose track of what the conversation is even about? Are you arguing that we should keep giving them those benefits?
Maybe you actually are. You're too off your meds to actually tell.
All I said was,
The ones who would commit crimes are likely already doing so anyway so the increase may not be as large as you think.
Some will go back, some won't.
It's definitely worth cutting the benefits.
I never said that those were the only things that we should do, and I never said that alone would be sufficient to solve the problem.
You can argue that some going back in #2 is optimistic, but they still have allegiance/ties to their countries and some places in latin america are much more livable than others.