Strongly disagree. His lectures on Pablo Freire's critical pedology are very good. He's read all the source books for critical theory, and he's able to distill them down to laymen terms.
That stuff is what he made his name with, originally. He's batshit nuts on everything else, though.
Strongly disagree. His lectures on Pablo Freire's critical pedology are very good. He's read all the source books for critical theory, and he's able to distill them down to laymen terms.
That stuff is what he made his name with, originally. He's batshit nuts on everything else, though.
And yet he is so wrong about everything else. Therefore he is also probably wrong about critical theory.