And yet again, such obviously illegal orders should be disobeyed, yes. To CALL FOR soldiers to disobey "illegal orders" (without saying what those are) is a specific crime. There's an actual law against it. It's also treasonous. That retired soldier should face a court-marshal too.
the code of military justice says that personnel can only reject "manifestly" illegal orders and specifically tells them not to bring their own judgement to that question.
That's a really high bar.
It remains illegal to council soldiers to disobey orders too. There is a specific law against it. There's no need to "remind" soldiers something they (as you say) are taught very early on. The Dems are doing so to lay the groundwork for insurrection. That's treason.
And yet again, such obviously illegal orders should be disobeyed, yes. To CALL FOR soldiers to disobey "illegal orders" (without saying what those are) is a specific crime. There's an actual law against it. It's also treasonous. That retired soldier should face a court-marshal too.
Not what you were saying
That's a really high bar.
It remains illegal to council soldiers to disobey orders too. There is a specific law against it. There's no need to "remind" soldiers something they (as you say) are taught very early on. The Dems are doing so to lay the groundwork for insurrection. That's treason.