Well yeah, because some of them are just going to be a million jeets coding with silly string and crayons while fielding the collective IQ matching that of a rusty spoon. And those will only be able to rely on ye olde jeet scam tactics for things rather than conduct mass surveillance since the operators will be too retarded to maintain focus.
Anyone that doesn't already know this is being naive. Every form of tech is another form of surveillance. They can already subpoena your AI chat history, just like your browser history. Tech companies keep every record possible of you, because data is their business. And the gov gets free access. Some companies give it willingly, so now warrant or subpoena is even necessary.
A NY judge just ordered openai to hand over millions of your private chat histories to the NYT without any subpoena or suspicion of wrongdoing on the part of the user :
Perfect example. What's even worse is that if NYT was a business partner of their's it wouldn't even take a judge's order. It would just be business as usual.
Original title: "The AI Bubble Was Never Real... You Were Just Lied To".
Tl;dw. Why companies are willing to pay billions of dollars on something that, as for the foreseeable future, doesn't seem profitable? The same reason Google keeps Youtube around: the data is far too valuable.
Moon proposes the hypothesis that the real push for AI's real purpose is social engineering
Why companies are willing to pay billions of dollars on something that, as for the foreseeable future, doesn't seem profitable?
There's some truth in all the data being valuable but the bigger driver is less interesting. Companies have FOMO. They saw what happened to companies that didn't adopt the Internet early, didn't adopt streaming early, thought social media was a fad, thought cloud wouldn't take off. And the hype around AI is bigger than any of those were at the onset.
They're willing to burn money now because they all want to be near the top when the money starts drying up and the bottom 95% of the field start die off or are ripe for acquisition. They think if they just spend harder, when everything settles, they'll be Amazon instead of pets.com.
And it's where the VC money is right now. AI is the new "blockchain." Slap the word "AI" on your product and get money from people with more money than sense because at least some of these AI companies will make it huge, right?
"If?"
Well yeah, because some of them are just going to be a million jeets coding with silly string and crayons while fielding the collective IQ matching that of a rusty spoon. And those will only be able to rely on ye olde jeet scam tactics for things rather than conduct mass surveillance since the operators will be too retarded to maintain focus.
Made me laugh.
Anyone that doesn't already know this is being naive. Every form of tech is another form of surveillance. They can already subpoena your AI chat history, just like your browser history. Tech companies keep every record possible of you, because data is their business. And the gov gets free access. Some companies give it willingly, so now warrant or subpoena is even necessary.
A NY judge just ordered openai to hand over millions of your private chat histories to the NYT without any subpoena or suspicion of wrongdoing on the part of the user :
https://openai.com/index/fighting-nyt-user-privacy-invasion/
Perfect example. What's even worse is that if NYT was a business partner of their's it wouldn't even take a judge's order. It would just be business as usual.
Original title: "The AI Bubble Was Never Real... You Were Just Lied To".
Tl;dw. Why companies are willing to pay billions of dollars on something that, as for the foreseeable future, doesn't seem profitable? The same reason Google keeps Youtube around: the data is far too valuable.
Moon proposes the hypothesis that the real push for AI's real purpose is social engineering
There's some truth in all the data being valuable but the bigger driver is less interesting. Companies have FOMO. They saw what happened to companies that didn't adopt the Internet early, didn't adopt streaming early, thought social media was a fad, thought cloud wouldn't take off. And the hype around AI is bigger than any of those were at the onset.
They're willing to burn money now because they all want to be near the top when the money starts drying up and the bottom 95% of the field start die off or are ripe for acquisition. They think if they just spend harder, when everything settles, they'll be Amazon instead of pets.com.
And it's where the VC money is right now. AI is the new "blockchain." Slap the word "AI" on your product and get money from people with more money than sense because at least some of these AI companies will make it huge, right?
Take that “What if” off the title.