I'm establishing standards and what the facts are about this situation. You don't know then how it was found out?
If a woman is a children's presenter on TV, and every public image of her is well presented to children, but in her private life she drinks underage and gossip channels catch wind and start spreading the news, is she a bad influence, or is the media for spreading the allegations?
I am. I was asking if you knew, and you don't. My research doesn't pull up much on it. We still don't know how it became known that she was underage drinking.
is she a bad influence
I'm asking you this question. Do you have any opinion, or do you just let others tell you how to think?
We still don't know how it became known that she was underage drinking.
And my point is that it's irrelevant. Which makes it even more strange that you're so desperate to play internet courtroom here, when it wasn't even a courtroom matter there.
Who cares?
I'm establishing standards and what the facts are about this situation. You don't know then how it was found out?
If a woman is a children's presenter on TV, and every public image of her is well presented to children, but in her private life she drinks underage and gossip channels catch wind and start spreading the news, is she a bad influence, or is the media for spreading the allegations?
No, you are not. The standards and facts are already established, and the whole thing is done with.
What you're trying to do is play internet courtroom. Stop being a redditor.
The Japanese think so.
I am. I was asking if you knew, and you don't. My research doesn't pull up much on it. We still don't know how it became known that she was underage drinking.
I'm asking you this question. Do you have any opinion, or do you just let others tell you how to think?
And my point is that it's irrelevant. Which makes it even more strange that you're so desperate to play internet courtroom here, when it wasn't even a courtroom matter there.