I think expecting someone to cater their personal life to their screen persona is stupid. Obviously, some offenses are greater than others, underage drinking being mild at best.
Was she drinking in front of the kids? Was she telling the kids to drink? Where did her bad influence come into play?
Because if this is something we should take seriously, then we should have standards of what specifically is not allowed.
So your claim then is that, for a public figure, they can have absolutely zero influence of children unless an act is done directly in front of them? Sorry but that doesn't hold water either.
I agree! This claim doesn't hold water. Phew, I sure am glad I didn't say that, nor do I believe it! Would be pretty stupid to think that. My questions are asking about what exactly she did wrong. Just trying to establish the facts.
If a woman is a children's presenter on TV, and every public image of her is well presented to children, but in her private life she drinks underage and gossip channels catch wind and start spreading the news, is she a bad influence, or is the media for spreading the allegations? This is why I asked the questions that I asked.
They do. That's the point.
Great! I'm asking what those standards are.
Was she drinking in front of the kids? Was she telling the kids to drink? Where did her bad influence come into play?
2 guys have voiced Elmo and one is a pedophile.
I think expecting someone to cater their personal life to their screen persona is stupid. Obviously, some offenses are greater than others, underage drinking being mild at best.
Was she drinking in front of the kids? Was she telling the kids to drink? Where did her bad influence come into play?
Because if this is something we should take seriously, then we should have standards of what specifically is not allowed.
The Japanese don't.
So your claim then is that, for a public figure, they can have absolutely zero influence of children unless an act is done directly in front of them?
Sorry but that doesn't hold water either. The concepts of reputation and disgrace are not imaginary.
They do. That's the point.
I agree! This claim doesn't hold water. Phew, I sure am glad I didn't say that, nor do I believe it! Would be pretty stupid to think that. My questions are asking about what exactly she did wrong. Just trying to establish the facts.
If a woman is a children's presenter on TV, and every public image of her is well presented to children, but in her private life she drinks underage and gossip channels catch wind and start spreading the news, is she a bad influence, or is the media for spreading the allegations? This is why I asked the questions that I asked.
Great! I'm asking what those standards are.
Was she drinking in front of the kids? Was she telling the kids to drink? Where did her bad influence come into play?
Disgraced her employer and rendered herself unsuitable as a role model for children.
The Japanese think so.
No, you're obfuscating. And asking what are, frankly, low trust and mid IQ questions.
How was it discovered that she drank underage?