I think part of the reason its working is because a lot of people are basically salivating at the thought of the niggers and other SNAP fraudsters suffering, of which I am completely guilty and I think all of us can agree its probably morally justified.
But for the fainter heart, the normies in the middle that are easily swayed by those "14 heartbreaking photos" type propaganda, that's a very easy thing to show to frame it as "look at the Righties trying to kill the poors and laughing about it!"
good point, it's easily skewed as "the Republicans aren't trying to sabotage SNAP, but if they did it would be a good thing!"
I personally don't have any problems with the concept of snap, but like most things run by the federal government, it's horribly implemented. At the barest minimums, SNAP should never cover items that have zero nutritional or health benefit whatsoever, such as soda.
I think conceptually its a great idea. I know quite a few families that survived off it and would have fallen into holes they could never recover from without it, and are now fine.
Problem is, as always, it needs to be nigger-proofed. You can't rely on high-trust, dignity or pride to protect it from abuse. You need extremely specific limitations and rules, almost to a point of comedy, or else it just becomes a generational abuse of our tax dollars.
Personally, I think the barest minimum that should have been there from the start are "coupons for specific foods, not cash to spend on anything" and lifetime limits, where if you go over you are clearly not deserving of the help any further.
I think part of the reason its working is because a lot of people are basically salivating at the thought of the niggers and other SNAP fraudsters suffering, of which I am completely guilty and I think all of us can agree its probably morally justified.
But for the fainter heart, the normies in the middle that are easily swayed by those "14 heartbreaking photos" type propaganda, that's a very easy thing to show to frame it as "look at the Righties trying to kill the poors and laughing about it!"
good point, it's easily skewed as "the Republicans aren't trying to sabotage SNAP, but if they did it would be a good thing!"
I personally don't have any problems with the concept of snap, but like most things run by the federal government, it's horribly implemented. At the barest minimums, SNAP should never cover items that have zero nutritional or health benefit whatsoever, such as soda.
I think conceptually its a great idea. I know quite a few families that survived off it and would have fallen into holes they could never recover from without it, and are now fine.
Problem is, as always, it needs to be nigger-proofed. You can't rely on high-trust, dignity or pride to protect it from abuse. You need extremely specific limitations and rules, almost to a point of comedy, or else it just becomes a generational abuse of our tax dollars.
Personally, I think the barest minimum that should have been there from the start are "coupons for specific foods, not cash to spend on anything" and lifetime limits, where if you go over you are clearly not deserving of the help any further.