Not an error code, the message itself. It was testing independently whether a word in the message was upper case or lower case (Does string contains "Something"? Does string contain "something"). It was just a "guess" on what some random 3rd party library might emit as an error message.
There was also no need to catch and re-throw an error with a different message in this context - just let the error happen, nothing was handling it.
I agree. Most AI problems come from people who don't know how to do their jobs, or use AI. They just assume the AI made it for them. They don't understand the genius of the answering machine that asks if the screen is hooked up, the computer plugged in, and if it is turned on.
Not an error code, the message itself. It was testing independently whether a word in the message was upper case or lower case (Does string contains "Something"? Does string contain "something"). It was just a "guess" on what some random 3rd party library might emit as an error message.
There was also no need to catch and re-throw an error with a different message in this context - just let the error happen, nothing was handling it.
I agree. Most AI problems come from people who don't know how to do their jobs, or use AI. They just assume the AI made it for them. They don't understand the genius of the answering machine that asks if the screen is hooked up, the computer plugged in, and if it is turned on.