Ian Carroll could have phrased that a whole lot better, but he's correct.
The left owns this in large part, due to their reaction, no matter who killed Charlie. We shouldn't let them walk away from that. But a bunch of shitty opportunists are also pretending to speak for Charlie Kirk, and Posobiec is one of those shitters.
Charlie Kirk was TPUSA. TPUSA without Charlie is a skinsuit, and I'm deeply suspicious of people trying to prop them up.
Charlie Kirk's corpse is being used as a football by insane idealogues, and I hate it.
It's also very factional. When that guy tags Candace Owens and Ian Carroll...I'm just surprised they didn't also throw Tucker and some others in there. It's the anti-Zionist side, clearly.
Again, Ian Carroll's response wasn't the best, and I see how it's getting spun how it is, but it's also clear why he's being targeted. It's not because he's a groyper. He's not. It's not because he's a leftist. He's not. It's because he dares to think the wrong thing on a certain specific issue. Just like how Candace, Tucker, Megan Kelly, MTG, and more are conveniently smeared as the worst people ever. There's things to find fault with all those people over...but it's clear why they're being singled out for propaganda.
How should Ian have worded it better? How do you know what he intended to say if it is not what he said? You guys (including Trevor on the opposite side) are reading a ton of context into the tweet that isn't there.
What are you going to do, shoot them? No, you’re just going to keep talking. They’ve already won. They know what happens when you talk. They’re not afraid.
One of their tells is that they leave Info Wars off their shit list despite Harrison Smith planting the seeds of the "Israel killed Charlie Kirk" narrative months ago. Another is smearing everyone as a groyper, including Candace Owens who has feuded with Fuentes.
Ian Carroll could have phrased that a whole lot better, but he's correct.
The left owns this in large part, due to their reaction, no matter who killed Charlie. We shouldn't let them walk away from that. But a bunch of shitty opportunists are also pretending to speak for Charlie Kirk, and Posobiec is one of those shitters.
Charlie Kirk was TPUSA. TPUSA without Charlie is a skinsuit, and I'm deeply suspicious of people trying to prop them up.
Charlie Kirk's corpse is being used as a football by insane idealogues, and I hate it.
It's also very factional. When that guy tags Candace Owens and Ian Carroll...I'm just surprised they didn't also throw Tucker and some others in there. It's the anti-Zionist side, clearly.
Again, Ian Carroll's response wasn't the best, and I see how it's getting spun how it is, but it's also clear why he's being targeted. It's not because he's a groyper. He's not. It's not because he's a leftist. He's not. It's because he dares to think the wrong thing on a certain specific issue. Just like how Candace, Tucker, Megan Kelly, MTG, and more are conveniently smeared as the worst people ever. There's things to find fault with all those people over...but it's clear why they're being singled out for propaganda.
Well said, you've encapsulated my thoughts better than I could.
How should Ian have worded it better? How do you know what he intended to say if it is not what he said? You guys (including Trevor on the opposite side) are reading a ton of context into the tweet that isn't there.
What are you going to do, shoot them? No, you’re just going to keep talking. They’ve already won. They know what happens when you talk. They’re not afraid.
One of their tells is that they leave Info Wars off their shit list despite Harrison Smith planting the seeds of the "Israel killed Charlie Kirk" narrative months ago. Another is smearing everyone as a groyper, including Candace Owens who has feuded with Fuentes.