The premise of the docu is that after years of being told that a comprehensive comparison of vaxxed and unvaxxed children can't be performed for ethical reasons, Del Bigtree (ICAN, HighWire) finally got somebody within the medical establishment to agree to a retrospective cohort study, comparing medical outcomes between groups. The only condition of Bigtree's was that whatever the study showed, the authors promised to publish what they found.
Well the study was completed and shows vastly increased rates of chronic illness among the vaccinated children. The lead author of the study, one Marcus Zervos of the Henry Ford clinic, is a vaccine proponent and likely did not expect it to produce the results it did. Once the study was complete, he refused to publish it officially because, as he states in a secretly filmed conversation, he fears for his career and because 'I'm not a good person'. Bigtree and his organisation are now being sent cease and desists from the Henry Ford clinic for defamation, unless they retract this very documentary about the study. It premiered at the Malibu Film Festival and online yesterday. Please share it with any normies it might influence.
As someone who's followed a lot of Highwire stuff, it doesn't reveal too much that's new for me, plus in my opinion Del spends too long burying the lede for the uninitiated, because he knows he's sitting on powerful ammunition. However once it brings everyone up to speed, the footage secretly filmed at dinner with Marcus Zervos is very damning and revealing. Zervos considers it a good study, an important one, the best that could be done as things stand... he agrees with Del about the issues - but he has agreed (with somebody) not to publish it because he doesn't want to be hounded, because he thinks it wouldn't change anything and because he's weak and 'got too many other things to worry about'. Which in turn means the story is much bigger than Marcus Zervos alone and it reveals that everything Bigtree says is true, about scientific cover ups and their willingness to publish if the study had shown the opposite results.
Thanks for posting. None of this is surprising, but this here is the truly infuriating part...
Zervos considers it a good study, an important one, the best that could be done as things stand... he agrees with Del about the issues - but he has agreed (with somebody) not to publish it because he doesn't want to be hounded, because he thinks it wouldn't change anything and because he's weak and 'got too many other things to worry about'.
Whenever I say men are to blame for the current civilisation implosion, THIS is why.
Weak men who go along with the strategies of the elites to destabilise society by either hiding important information, refusing to stand by facts, or supporting parties who have malicious intent for humanity.
Too many simps and beta males have given way for evil to reign.
The worst part is that if you listen to their conversation, it seems that it's not retirement which is the thing that bothers him, since he said to Del Bigtree that coming under fire wouldn't scare him because he was close to retirement anyway. Instead it's the nature of the retirement that bothers him and that it wouldn't be comfy enough for him at this point in time.
Edited convo:
Zervos: "I'd like to just, you know, finish out my work doing international work."
Bigtree: "You said 'I'm all about the data and I'm about to retire anyway', that's literally what you said. So your energy's definitely changed on that..."
Zervos dabbing mouth: "Energy's changing."
It's an exchange at 1h09m8s in the docu. What does late career 'international work' mean for a doc like this? Guess he's saying he doesn't want to be cut out of the NGO gravy train? Can't be part of Bill Gates' great schemes to vaxx the third world if you're a famous antivaxxer, after all.
since he said to Del Bigtree that coming under fire wouldn't scare him because he was close to retirement anyway.
He said that before the study right? When he still believed that it would prove his beliefs correct.
If you dare to touch the medical dogmas you're not simply going to get fired. You'll be ostracized entirely. You'll become a pariah. And that is if you manage to withstand the pressure that's going to come down on you trying to force you to retract what you found. I didn't get the impression that it was about the money for him. I do think he's simply scared and his principles aren't strong enough to overcome his weakness. Though I might be wrong.
Even for Paul Offit and Stanley Plotkin it probably is only partially about the money and partially about feeling the need to poison wells in a more sophisticated way. It sure is funny how 'every single time' actually means every single time.
The premise of the docu is that after years of being told that a comprehensive comparison of vaxxed and unvaxxed children can't be performed for ethical reasons, Del Bigtree (ICAN, HighWire) finally got somebody within the medical establishment to agree to a retrospective cohort study, comparing medical outcomes between groups. The only condition of Bigtree's was that whatever the study showed, the authors promised to publish what they found.
Well the study was completed and shows vastly increased rates of chronic illness among the vaccinated children. The lead author of the study, one Marcus Zervos of the Henry Ford clinic, is a vaccine proponent and likely did not expect it to produce the results it did. Once the study was complete, he refused to publish it officially because, as he states in a secretly filmed conversation, he fears for his career and because 'I'm not a good person'. Bigtree and his organisation are now being sent cease and desists from the Henry Ford clinic for defamation, unless they retract this very documentary about the study. It premiered at the Malibu Film Festival and online yesterday. Please share it with any normies it might influence.
As someone who's followed a lot of Highwire stuff, it doesn't reveal too much that's new for me, plus in my opinion Del spends too long burying the lede for the uninitiated, because he knows he's sitting on powerful ammunition. However once it brings everyone up to speed, the footage secretly filmed at dinner with Marcus Zervos is very damning and revealing. Zervos considers it a good study, an important one, the best that could be done as things stand... he agrees with Del about the issues - but he has agreed (with somebody) not to publish it because he doesn't want to be hounded, because he thinks it wouldn't change anything and because he's weak and 'got too many other things to worry about'. Which in turn means the story is much bigger than Marcus Zervos alone and it reveals that everything Bigtree says is true, about scientific cover ups and their willingness to publish if the study had shown the opposite results.
Now someone just needs to make a double blind study to find out if vaccines actually work.
Thanks for posting. None of this is surprising, but this here is the truly infuriating part...
Whenever I say men are to blame for the current civilisation implosion, THIS is why.
Weak men who go along with the strategies of the elites to destabilise society by either hiding important information, refusing to stand by facts, or supporting parties who have malicious intent for humanity.
Too many simps and beta males have given way for evil to reign.
The worst part is that if you listen to their conversation, it seems that it's not retirement which is the thing that bothers him, since he said to Del Bigtree that coming under fire wouldn't scare him because he was close to retirement anyway. Instead it's the nature of the retirement that bothers him and that it wouldn't be comfy enough for him at this point in time.
Edited convo:
It's an exchange at 1h09m8s in the docu. What does late career 'international work' mean for a doc like this? Guess he's saying he doesn't want to be cut out of the NGO gravy train? Can't be part of Bill Gates' great schemes to vaxx the third world if you're a famous antivaxxer, after all.
He said that before the study right? When he still believed that it would prove his beliefs correct.
If you dare to touch the medical dogmas you're not simply going to get fired. You'll be ostracized entirely. You'll become a pariah. And that is if you manage to withstand the pressure that's going to come down on you trying to force you to retract what you found. I didn't get the impression that it was about the money for him. I do think he's simply scared and his principles aren't strong enough to overcome his weakness. Though I might be wrong.
Even for Paul Offit and Stanley Plotkin it probably is only partially about the money and partially about feeling the need to poison wells in a more sophisticated way. It sure is funny how 'every single time' actually means every single time.