I'd rather not share my product with them at this point. If they want to kill us all for the """crime""" of disagreeing with their idiotic policies, then there is no need to be 'productive' with them.
And hey, they're the lowlife scum who always declare war on farmers to create artificial scarcity - what they do often ends up not good for them. That's not an excuse to be 'productive' with them.
Why should you seek consensus and 'productivity' with people who want you dead?
Kirk's assassination wasn't conducive to the left's success, since it only increased resistance against their agenda. That's how political assassinations and their celebration are counterproductive to one's agenda. Counter-productive means detrimental instead of beneficial.
It only showed how complete their brainwashing is. Even now, their offshore propagandists repeat the lie that the shooter was a maga boomer with CP on his phone.
The fact that they celebrate it is proof that they have no intent to debate and will engage in political assassinations against people that harm their narrative, even if the target is deemed a moderate. It doesn't matter how nice he was, they called Rush Limbaugh a nazi, and Charlie Kirk a cannibalistic humanoid underground dweller and celebrated their deaths.
I'm done playing nice, but if you're going to debate them, please wear a blast suit or something.
I'm, not debating them. I'm just saying that the left wasn't benefited by Kirk's murder. On the contrary, the event only served to further the cause of the opposing side. In a similar way, celebrating political assassinations would be bad for the right if they begin doing it.
My point stands. Political assassinations and their celebration is counterproductive.
Your point does not stand. They started the war.
I'd rather not share my product with them at this point. If they want to kill us all for the """crime""" of disagreeing with their idiotic policies, then there is no need to be 'productive' with them.
And hey, they're the lowlife scum who always declare war on farmers to create artificial scarcity - what they do often ends up not good for them. That's not an excuse to be 'productive' with them.
Why should you seek consensus and 'productivity' with people who want you dead?
Kirk's assassination wasn't conducive to the left's success, since it only increased resistance against their agenda. That's how political assassinations and their celebration are counterproductive to one's agenda. Counter-productive means detrimental instead of beneficial.
It only showed how complete their brainwashing is. Even now, their offshore propagandists repeat the lie that the shooter was a maga boomer with CP on his phone.
The fact that they celebrate it is proof that they have no intent to debate and will engage in political assassinations against people that harm their narrative, even if the target is deemed a moderate. It doesn't matter how nice he was, they called Rush Limbaugh a nazi, and Charlie Kirk a cannibalistic humanoid underground dweller and celebrated their deaths.
I'm done playing nice, but if you're going to debate them, please wear a blast suit or something.
I'm, not debating them. I'm just saying that the left wasn't benefited by Kirk's murder. On the contrary, the event only served to further the cause of the opposing side. In a similar way, celebrating political assassinations would be bad for the right if they begin doing it.
Tell it to some dancing Israelis, bad actor.
Sheesh. I'm just trying to be a good Catholic.