It only showed how complete their brainwashing is. Even now, their offshore propagandists repeat the lie that the shooter was a maga boomer with CP on his phone.
The fact that they celebrate it is proof that they have no intent to debate and will engage in political assassinations against people that harm their narrative, even if the target is deemed a moderate. It doesn't matter how nice he was, they called Rush Limbaugh a nazi, and Charlie Kirk a cannibalistic humanoid underground dweller and celebrated their deaths.
I'm done playing nice, but if you're going to debate them, please wear a blast suit or something.
I'm, not debating them. I'm just saying that the left wasn't benefited by Kirk's murder. On the contrary, the event only served to further the cause of the opposing side. In a similar way, celebrating political assassinations would be bad for the right if they begin doing it.
So exactly how is celebrating the defeat of a communist invasion 'counterproductive'?
If it wasn't for the esteemed Yamaguchi Otoya, Japan would be under complete marxist occupation now, and the economic prosperity that led to the Golden Age of Man would never have happened. No one's calling out the lies of the left - not even their mainstream media has bothered to make any sort of correction after calling the shooter a 'boomer' / 'from a maga family'. The only "benefit" is that it has marked clear lines in the sand.
Here's the problem with your argument: You assume that the left has any kind of honor and decency, that they have standards. That they have lines that should not be cross.
They do not. They'll screech for decades about St. Fentanyl, but celebrate the murder of those they deem 'fascist' (i.e, anyone to the right of Pol Pot)
It only showed how complete their brainwashing is. Even now, their offshore propagandists repeat the lie that the shooter was a maga boomer with CP on his phone.
The fact that they celebrate it is proof that they have no intent to debate and will engage in political assassinations against people that harm their narrative, even if the target is deemed a moderate. It doesn't matter how nice he was, they called Rush Limbaugh a nazi, and Charlie Kirk a cannibalistic humanoid underground dweller and celebrated their deaths.
I'm done playing nice, but if you're going to debate them, please wear a blast suit or something.
I'm, not debating them. I'm just saying that the left wasn't benefited by Kirk's murder. On the contrary, the event only served to further the cause of the opposing side. In a similar way, celebrating political assassinations would be bad for the right if they begin doing it.
So exactly how is celebrating the defeat of a communist invasion 'counterproductive'?
If it wasn't for the esteemed Yamaguchi Otoya, Japan would be under complete marxist occupation now, and the economic prosperity that led to the Golden Age of Man would never have happened. No one's calling out the lies of the left - not even their mainstream media has bothered to make any sort of correction after calling the shooter a 'boomer' / 'from a maga family'. The only "benefit" is that it has marked clear lines in the sand.
Here's the problem with your argument: You assume that the left has any kind of honor and decency, that they have standards. That they have lines that should not be cross.
They do not. They'll screech for decades about St. Fentanyl, but celebrate the murder of those they deem 'fascist' (i.e, anyone to the right of Pol Pot)