They also MKUltra'd a random guy and made him fuck trannies for a year and then walk around with a rifle down his pants and then climb up on the roof at the right time and then jump off the roof with the rifle and then escape the law for several days
There isn't any proof for any of that. Excepting the tranny fucking part. The university campus is covered in security cameras. It'd be the easiest thing in the world to track every single step that Tyler took. But instead we only have a parking lot security camera that covered roof including the spot where he supposedly shot from but the only footage we got from that is someone in the midst of running away and jumping down the roof. No rifle. No laying prone to shoot. No stuffing a rifle down the pants. No disassembly. No assembly. No climbing up on the roof. Nothing.
So... the wrong gun is one inconsistency of many.
But I guess the people doing the coverup being different from the people who killed Charlie is a concept that is simply too outlandish. If I assassinate someone I couldn't care less about who gets blamed for it in the end as long as it isn't me.
Let's just assume Israel did it. Could the US government, that has been under Israeli control for a very long time, allow Israel to be blamed for it or would they have to scramble to create a cover story no matter how unbelievable it would sound? And is it possible that mistakes will happen when scrambling for a cover story in a very short amount of time when you didn't know the assassination would take place?
It's not like Israel has to fear any consequences. They tried to sink the USS Liberty, murdered 34 American sailors and injured 171, damaged the ship beyond repair and what was the result of it? Unconditional US support for Israel ever since.
>There isn't any proof for any of that. Excepting the tranny fucking part
It's actually the exact opposite of that. There's no video of him fucking a tranny.
>Let's just assume Israel did it
Ok sure, here's how they would do it. They would use their massive intelligence apparatus to identify vulnerable people online, evaluate likely candidates, then pick a few to groom by having agents befriend them online and in real life, including romantic partners. Then gas him up and feed him tactics until he does it acting alone. Then kill him before he can give details.
Note that none of this involves wacky spy gadgets, or a dozen agents on the ground, or a coordinated dance around 50 civilian cameras, or recruiting local law enforcement or medical examiners. Just a guy with a rifle and bad ideas. This is the way it's actually done. Find a nut, gas him up. That's all it takes.
Nobody knows how exactly Charlie was killed and people speculating really doesn't change anything about the countless and incredible inconsistencies in the official story. So you're only poisoning the well instead of actually arguing.
or a dozen agents on the ground
Even in your MKUltra example you would have to have agents on the ground. Believe it or not.
or a coordinated dance around 50 civilian cameras
In this day and age every single person has a camera in their pocket. You always dance around them.
or recruiting local law enforcement or medical examiners.
That shit happens so often I don't really get how you could see that as outlandish.
Find a nut, gas him up. That's all it takes.
And that takes a lot of preparation and you have to get directly involved too to ensure he succeeds. Which takes time. It isn't exactly feasible when you decide to kill someone on a whim. And it wouldn't have an educational effect on your other cattle to stay in their lane either.
Funny how the ICE shooting not a few weeks back was literally the exact scenario you described playing out just as you laid it out, but that story wasn't as exploitable so it just got left in the memory hole instantly.
Heck it even had a bunch of suspicious and questionable elements just like this, but nah, not griftable so back to Charlie.
There isn't any proof for any of that. Excepting the tranny fucking part. The university campus is covered in security cameras. It'd be the easiest thing in the world to track every single step that Tyler took. But instead we only have a parking lot security camera that covered roof including the spot where he supposedly shot from but the only footage we got from that is someone in the midst of running away and jumping down the roof. No rifle. No laying prone to shoot. No stuffing a rifle down the pants. No disassembly. No assembly. No climbing up on the roof. Nothing.
So... the wrong gun is one inconsistency of many.
But I guess the people doing the coverup being different from the people who killed Charlie is a concept that is simply too outlandish. If I assassinate someone I couldn't care less about who gets blamed for it in the end as long as it isn't me.
Let's just assume Israel did it. Could the US government, that has been under Israeli control for a very long time, allow Israel to be blamed for it or would they have to scramble to create a cover story no matter how unbelievable it would sound? And is it possible that mistakes will happen when scrambling for a cover story in a very short amount of time when you didn't know the assassination would take place?
It's not like Israel has to fear any consequences. They tried to sink the USS Liberty, murdered 34 American sailors and injured 171, damaged the ship beyond repair and what was the result of it? Unconditional US support for Israel ever since.
>There isn't any proof for any of that. Excepting the tranny fucking part
It's actually the exact opposite of that. There's no video of him fucking a tranny.
>Let's just assume Israel did it
Ok sure, here's how they would do it. They would use their massive intelligence apparatus to identify vulnerable people online, evaluate likely candidates, then pick a few to groom by having agents befriend them online and in real life, including romantic partners. Then gas him up and feed him tactics until he does it acting alone. Then kill him before he can give details.
Note that none of this involves wacky spy gadgets, or a dozen agents on the ground, or a coordinated dance around 50 civilian cameras, or recruiting local law enforcement or medical examiners. Just a guy with a rifle and bad ideas. This is the way it's actually done. Find a nut, gas him up. That's all it takes.
Nobody knows how exactly Charlie was killed and people speculating really doesn't change anything about the countless and incredible inconsistencies in the official story. So you're only poisoning the well instead of actually arguing.
Even in your MKUltra example you would have to have agents on the ground. Believe it or not.
In this day and age every single person has a camera in their pocket. You always dance around them.
That shit happens so often I don't really get how you could see that as outlandish.
And that takes a lot of preparation and you have to get directly involved too to ensure he succeeds. Which takes time. It isn't exactly feasible when you decide to kill someone on a whim. And it wouldn't have an educational effect on your other cattle to stay in their lane either.
Funny how the ICE shooting not a few weeks back was literally the exact scenario you described playing out just as you laid it out, but that story wasn't as exploitable so it just got left in the memory hole instantly.
Heck it even had a bunch of suspicious and questionable elements just like this, but nah, not griftable so back to Charlie.