The Empire's Assassins: "The Lone Nut" Archetype
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
There are a bunch of holes in the official story, too, though. You can't just use the crazy conspiracy theories to discredit the actual problems with the case.
The feds always lie, and this case is no different. Maybe the alleged killer is actually the killer...and maybe he isn't. They haven't made a compelling case, they've hidden information (not releasing pictures they claimed to have during the manhunt was weird as fuck), and they've talked in circles and made all sorts of weird claims.
The feds are either incompetent, or lying...probably both. Doesn't make the wildest conspiracy theories true, but I do think there's more going on here than we're being told.
>Maybe the alleged killer is actually the killer...and maybe he isn't
This video isn't "just asking questions" it flatly asserts that Charlie Kirk wasn't killed by a rifle, but by some kind of spy gadget. It asserts that there were multiple shooters. If you don't want to be judged by "crazy conspiracies" then stop posting and upvoting them.
The Charlie Kirk Assassination Doesn't Add Up
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=68cbcca9b94d88e6ec681645
The Charlie Kirk Assassination is Now Officially A Coverup
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=68d70fd75a5753a787fa73d2
"WHAT THEY TOLD US ABOUT CHARLIE KIRK'S ASSASSINATION IS WRONG!"
https://www.banned.video/watch?id=68ddbe633afc9155c32e0a64
One of the big problems with this, and all sorts of other conspiracy heavy stories, is that everyone finds one thread and assume it unravels the entire thing. Like this piece doesn't make sense, so everything that is evidence of the story being true is now invalid. Or vice versa.
It makes any real discussion impossible, because people will laser focus on the part that fits their narrative, treat it as proof definitive, and discard literally everything else as irrelevant despite it being just as important a piece as the part they are treating as sacred.
This story is full of holes and suspicious shit, but, just like JFK or the Vegas shooting, its also likely we will never figure it out either and no amount of "zoom on that pixel, enhance" will be the crucial element. But a lot of people are happy to claim they did for the grift to get the most Clickbait money possible off the death of this man, and then have people rush in with their confirmation bias to say its now the gospel truth.