Doesn't make the wildest conspiracy theories true, but I do think there's more going on here than we're being told.

One of the big problems with this, and all sorts of other conspiracy heavy stories, is that everyone finds one thread and assume it unravels the entire thing. Like this piece doesn't make sense, so everything that is evidence of the story being true is now invalid. Or vice versa.

It makes any real discussion impossible, because people will laser focus on the part that fits their narrative, treat it as proof definitive, and discard literally everything else as irrelevant despite it being just as important a piece as the part they are treating as sacred.

This story is full of holes and suspicious shit, but, just like JFK or the Vegas shooting, its also likely we will never figure it out either and no amount of "zoom on that pixel, enhance" will be the crucial element. But a lot of people are happy to claim they did for the grift to get the most Clickbait money possible off the death of this man, and then have people rush in with their confirmation bias to say its now the gospel truth.