No, they didn't, it's in the judicial process. The part that they released literally shows nothing because it doesn't show the stabbing.
Because it was cropped.
To answer your own question, it looks like that camera's angle was extremely wide, because it also goes off to the right another 30 to 40 degrees. It looks like it wouldn't fit on any normal screen. And that's assuming that the shooting position was that corner.
Now you're outright lying.
Where are you getting the disassembly from? All I've heard is that it is speculation that he may have done that. Nothing conclusive, even from the police.
Transparency in an extremely politically charged case
You're getting more transparency than you would ever normally get on any case. In a normal case, none of this would have been publicly released.
Dodging the question
You're literally just making shit up and claiming I'm not addressing things I'm literally addressing.
Yes, they did. They're trying to keep it out of public view. Initially they literally tried to spin it so that the nigger was the victim of the bullying whiteys. That is literally covering up the fact that a rabid nigger deliberately killed another White guy simply because he wanted to kill him. They don't release the video because just as in Irynas case it would clearly show reality and just as in Irynas case that would fuel the anger of people and snap others out of their illusion.
And it's in the judicial process? Seriously? A lot of good that has done for Derek Chauvin.
And that's assuming that the shooting position was that corner.
It is. We know that for a fact. You can verify it yourself easily.
Where are you getting the disassembly from? All I've heard is that it is speculation that he may have done that. Nothing conclusive, even from the police.
Okay then tell me how you smuggle a full sized hunting rifle through a packed campus with only the clothes on your back and a backpack without anyone noticing. And without it being visible in the security footage.
When 'Tyler' ran away on the roof he wasn't carrying a rifle and you sure as hell aren't able to sprint with a rifle down your pants leg.
I know what you're doing. You're arguing semantics. Unless I present you an official press release by the FBI you're going to pretend they never made that claim. Despite literally the entire media landscape running with the disassembly story.
You're getting more transparency than you would ever normally get on any case. In a normal case, none of this would have been publicly released.
Because his murder was livestreamed and filmed by multiple people. The little hard evidence we have wasn't given to us by the FBI. None of the murder footage was released to us by the FBI. All of it was either livestreamed or released by private individuals. Stop being disingenuous.
You're literally just making shit up and claiming I'm not addressing things I'm literally addressing.
You literally haven't answered my question yet. Why did the FBI release cropped and cut footage of him running on the roof and jumping down but not the rest of that particular video?
You are pretending that is a close and shut case that Tyler killed Charlie despite having no hard evidence for it whatsoever.
They're trying to keep it out of public view.... blah blah blah
The police are operating with more transparency in that case than they normally do. Your associating the media, leftwing activists, the defense attorneys, the judges in Derek Chauvin's case, and the media in regards to Iryana's case... with this police departing in relationship to this murder.
Okay then tell me how you smuggle a full sized hunting rifle through a packed campus with only the clothes on your back and a backpack without anyone noticing. And without it being visible in the security footage.
Who says that's what's happened? He clearly left the weapon in a drop-off point, he could have placed it in a drop-off point at a different time too. He seems to have even been smart enough to not try and get past the police cordon until it cleared, so there's some planning here that isn't as simple as "he disassembled it and carried it in his asshole". I don't have a clear answer as to how he got the rifle there because I don't have all the evidence yet, and you've managed to convince yourself from your own speculation about what must have happened.
When 'Tyler' ran away on the roof he wasn't carrying a rifle
Looks to me like he was carrying it in a bag.
Despite literally the entire media landscape running with the disassembly story
No, just your media landscape. What you are consuming. That's the whole problem. Shit's getting injected that hasn't been established. I've seen people saying, "well where's the screwdriver he needs to disassemble the rifle???"... Who told you you need to disassemble a rifle with a screwdriver, some don't need them. I haven't used a modern Mauser, but old Mauser's just used to have pins and latches. People are injecting shit which has never existed. That's not semantics, it's "playing a game of telephone".
Because his murder was livestreamed and filmed by multiple people. The little hard evidence we have wasn't given to us by the FBI. None of the murder footage was released to us by the FBI. All of it was either livestreamed or released by private individuals. Stop being disingenuous.
That's entirely my point. This shit doesn't normally get released even before the murderer is caught. You're used to police body cam footage getting released the same day to prevent riots. That's not the norm. Usually you don't see this shit until -after- the trial ends. This is more transparency than most cases ever get.
Why did the FBI release cropped and cut footage of him running on the roof and jumping down but not the rest of that particular video?
I literally answered it. Seems like it's an abnormally long-width security video that wouldn't fit on a normal screen. Seems like they were showing the video that would most help in getting people to locate the shooter because that's when it was released as I recall.
You are pretending that is a close and shut case that Tyler killed Charlie despite having no hard evidence for it whatsoever.
The gun, the confession, and turning himself in is the most hard evidence any crime could possibly have; even if you don't think it's correct or there's more to the story: don't pretend there isn't hard evidence.
Because they tried to cover it up. Irynas murder has shown quite clearly why.
Because it was cropped.
https://x.com/Niall_Diarmuid/status/1968955433097306176
Now you're outright lying.
Transparency in an extremely politically charged case.
Can't accept evidence that doesn't exist.
Like always you're dodging the question and trying to derail the conversation.
No, they didn't, it's in the judicial process. The part that they released literally shows nothing because it doesn't show the stabbing.
To answer your own question, it looks like that camera's angle was extremely wide, because it also goes off to the right another 30 to 40 degrees. It looks like it wouldn't fit on any normal screen. And that's assuming that the shooting position was that corner.
Where are you getting the disassembly from? All I've heard is that it is speculation that he may have done that. Nothing conclusive, even from the police.
You're getting more transparency than you would ever normally get on any case. In a normal case, none of this would have been publicly released.
You're literally just making shit up and claiming I'm not addressing things I'm literally addressing.
Yes, they did. They're trying to keep it out of public view. Initially they literally tried to spin it so that the nigger was the victim of the bullying whiteys. That is literally covering up the fact that a rabid nigger deliberately killed another White guy simply because he wanted to kill him. They don't release the video because just as in Irynas case it would clearly show reality and just as in Irynas case that would fuel the anger of people and snap others out of their illusion.
And it's in the judicial process? Seriously? A lot of good that has done for Derek Chauvin.
It is. We know that for a fact. You can verify it yourself easily.
Okay then tell me how you smuggle a full sized hunting rifle through a packed campus with only the clothes on your back and a backpack without anyone noticing. And without it being visible in the security footage.
When 'Tyler' ran away on the roof he wasn't carrying a rifle and you sure as hell aren't able to sprint with a rifle down your pants leg.
I know what you're doing. You're arguing semantics. Unless I present you an official press release by the FBI you're going to pretend they never made that claim. Despite literally the entire media landscape running with the disassembly story.
Because his murder was livestreamed and filmed by multiple people. The little hard evidence we have wasn't given to us by the FBI. None of the murder footage was released to us by the FBI. All of it was either livestreamed or released by private individuals. Stop being disingenuous.
You literally haven't answered my question yet. Why did the FBI release cropped and cut footage of him running on the roof and jumping down but not the rest of that particular video?
You are pretending that is a close and shut case that Tyler killed Charlie despite having no hard evidence for it whatsoever.
The police are operating with more transparency in that case than they normally do. Your associating the media, leftwing activists, the defense attorneys, the judges in Derek Chauvin's case, and the media in regards to Iryana's case... with this police departing in relationship to this murder.
Who says that's what's happened? He clearly left the weapon in a drop-off point, he could have placed it in a drop-off point at a different time too. He seems to have even been smart enough to not try and get past the police cordon until it cleared, so there's some planning here that isn't as simple as "he disassembled it and carried it in his asshole". I don't have a clear answer as to how he got the rifle there because I don't have all the evidence yet, and you've managed to convince yourself from your own speculation about what must have happened.
Looks to me like he was carrying it in a bag.
No, just your media landscape. What you are consuming. That's the whole problem. Shit's getting injected that hasn't been established. I've seen people saying, "well where's the screwdriver he needs to disassemble the rifle???"... Who told you you need to disassemble a rifle with a screwdriver, some don't need them. I haven't used a modern Mauser, but old Mauser's just used to have pins and latches. People are injecting shit which has never existed. That's not semantics, it's "playing a game of telephone".
That's entirely my point. This shit doesn't normally get released even before the murderer is caught. You're used to police body cam footage getting released the same day to prevent riots. That's not the norm. Usually you don't see this shit until -after- the trial ends. This is more transparency than most cases ever get.
I literally answered it. Seems like it's an abnormally long-width security video that wouldn't fit on a normal screen. Seems like they were showing the video that would most help in getting people to locate the shooter because that's when it was released as I recall.
The gun, the confession, and turning himself in is the most hard evidence any crime could possibly have; even if you don't think it's correct or there's more to the story: don't pretend there isn't hard evidence.