Taking everything in, I DON'T think Israel and it's organisations DIRECTLY assassinated Charlie Kirk.
I DO think Israel focused mischaracterisation of him and encouragd extreme opinion of him through media and social media so people would have more extreme negative views of him that may justify violence against him.
Basically, Israel is doing more Radio Rwanda than grassy knoll...
Its way too easy to get a random Leftie retard to commit violence for you that it would be idiotic to directly implicate yourself by directly doing it. Just hype up some random idiot, lay out enough incompetence that they can get through, and the job gets done (or the message across).
Its the same thing that happened with Trump's assassination attempt, he just got lucky (or saved by God) that the kid missed the kill.
With all the various factions in our government (and international factions like Israel who've infiltrated) there will never be truly "undeniable" evidence. Even if they come out and say things directly and take full responsibility, half the country would say it was a lie, psyop and actually X behind it.
If we are being honest with ourselves, almost no official story would satisfy us. Even if the evidence was strong, it would only be taken if it was exactly what we wanted it to be and that would be regardless of evidence not because of it.
Its a symptom of our society being not even low trust but outright no trust in anything. For good reason, but still.
I don't want an official story that will satisfy everyone (impossible, utopian). I want an official story that will satisfy most reasonable people (extremely possible).
For example, the sinking of the Costa Concordia is a well-documented, clearly-sourced, easily understood historical event.
The magic bullet that keeps turning up with JFK, RFK, MLK, and now Kirk might as well be an Israeli child spitting on you four times. Or maybe a couple of those are purely Hoover. Who knows. If they were actually going to give us a reasonable explanation they would all be thrown out of office.
Taking everything in, I DON'T think Israel and it's organisations DIRECTLY assassinated Charlie Kirk.
I DO think Israel focused mischaracterisation of him and encouragd extreme opinion of him through media and social media so people would have more extreme negative views of him that may justify violence against him.
Basically, Israel is doing more Radio Rwanda than grassy knoll...
All the leftist propaganda is financed with Jewish money, so they literally are the origin of the assassination.
Probably they didn't want him dead, only canceled, and now they face leaks that may show that Jews lie and manipulate with money...
Maybe one day it will come out that it was not 6 millions and that old trains couldn't possibly move so many people...
Why would the FBI make that tranny lover leftist their patsy then? It is obvious that Charlie was shot from behind. Why the coverup?
Right-wing patsies are for when Israel is at peace. Left-wing patsies are for when Israel is at war.
The left does a great job of subverting America, but they can't be relied on for direct financial and military support.
Its way too easy to get a random Leftie retard to commit violence for you that it would be idiotic to directly implicate yourself by directly doing it. Just hype up some random idiot, lay out enough incompetence that they can get through, and the job gets done (or the message across).
Its the same thing that happened with Trump's assassination attempt, he just got lucky (or saved by God) that the kid missed the kill.
If the trigger puller was indeed an antifa tranny then the evidence should have been undeniable.
With all the various factions in our government (and international factions like Israel who've infiltrated) there will never be truly "undeniable" evidence. Even if they come out and say things directly and take full responsibility, half the country would say it was a lie, psyop and actually X behind it.
If we are being honest with ourselves, almost no official story would satisfy us. Even if the evidence was strong, it would only be taken if it was exactly what we wanted it to be and that would be regardless of evidence not because of it.
Its a symptom of our society being not even low trust but outright no trust in anything. For good reason, but still.
I don't want an official story that will satisfy everyone (impossible, utopian). I want an official story that will satisfy most reasonable people (extremely possible).
For example, the sinking of the Costa Concordia is a well-documented, clearly-sourced, easily understood historical event.
The magic bullet that keeps turning up with JFK, RFK, MLK, and now Kirk might as well be an Israeli child spitting on you four times. Or maybe a couple of those are purely Hoover. Who knows. If they were actually going to give us a reasonable explanation they would all be thrown out of office.