𝙾.𝙺. 𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚆𝚊𝚜 𝚈𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝙰𝚗𝚜𝚠𝚎𝚛?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Unfortunately, it seems to be the case that AI is not an "advice-giver" for a lot of retards and actual children, but instead is becoming a complete thought-outsourcing tool for them. My rage about this is reserved for the women in the OP who continually countersignal things like homeschooling and push for shit like more AI, because more tech is gooderer.
We've been taught to only rely on authority. Is this kid any different if she says her teacher or parent is right? Especially at her age?
This is why we have NPCs and why so many want to control AI.
Of course, which is why the people able to identify NPC behavior should take charge with the education of their children and not leave it in the hands of government sanctioned NPCs or their AI counterparts.
I'm sure there's something to that. I'd probably argue with respect to schoolchildren teachers should adapt, although I'd have argued that a long time ago well before AI. The busywork givers that care if you know the name of the boat the pilgrims were on when they came on their slaughter expedition or what date MLK was shot, well AI excels at that.
If they'd push real thought exercises, then AI could only assist as a tool. I'm not sure we want that either, because the thought exercises coming out of a teacher would be to explain to them how great communism is and how great it is to be a transgender with no room for dissent. Which I guess isn't much different because you're right back to regurgitating what the teacher wants to hear, and well AI can do that.