Not sure where you've been but for many years it was how diversity is our strength and how they enrich culture.
If you search a bit on google you will have a ton of articles about how diversity enriches your workplace, how it enriches your culture, your city etc.
If you are to ask any leftist boomer it will tell you how great it is to see all those different cultures that they don't interact with. Including my old team lead that lived in a 100% white area and had to go to the office once in 2 years to change his laptop and then started praising how great and diverse the offices were although it was mostly indians and he spoke to none of them.
Not sure where you've been but for many years it was how diversity is our strength and how they enrich culture.
If you search a bit on google you will have a ton of articles about how diversity enriches your workplace, how it enriches your culture, your city etc.
If you are to ask any leftist boomer it will tell you how great it is to see all those different cultures that they don't interact with. Including my old team lead that lived in a 100% white area and had to go to the office once in 2 years to change his laptop and then started praising how great and diverse the offices were although it was mostly indians and he spoke to none of them.
The enrichment angle was always an excuse more than a proper argument as far as I ever saw it. An insignificant factor that made no difference.
It was the economic side that made anyone take the position seriously, at least in my experience. The asylum angle also made some waves.