The left trying to prove the Right is more evil now, and memes from the right
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Top Left: The shooter was not fucking "far-right." Fuck all the way off. Also, take that stupid disingenuous whore Nancy Mace with you. The worst thing about her is people keep acting like she represents people like me. She's an evil retarded grifter, and I disavow.
Top, Middle-Right: I like the image.
Bottom Left: You can't hate these people enough. Charlie Kirk was not an evil bigot.
Middle Right: I really, really, really can't stand people - on either side - pretending to be experts on things they're not experts on. I'm also not a gun expert, to be clear, but that wasn't (explicitly) a "pro" shot. Obviously a pro could have done it, but so could plenty of non-pros. And everyone talking about "bullet drop" is retarded. It's around 1.3 inches at that range. Yeah, real world scenario you've got adrenaline, you have to have some skill and self-control, but it's point and shoot. A sitting target, a prone and concealed shooter, a powerful rifle. Miss me with that shit, like I wish they'd missed Charlie Kirk.
Yeah, I never heard of a far right guy who is gay with a tranny girlfriend. No doubt, some guys on the far right are closet homosexuals but they suppress that shit. So if a gay guy is acting out his gayness with a tranny girlfriend, he's definitely left leaning.
1.3 inches? That much?
Apparently. Still nearly irrelevant for a chest shot. Hit anywhere in that area and they're probably gone.
There shouldn't be any bullet drop when aiming downward at the range he was at. If anything, it should hit higher than the crosshairs. When a rifle is zeroed, the optics are set so that the bullet "falls" into the crosshairs at a set range. With physics being what they are, it means the bullet leaves the barrel going slightly upward for the parabolic arc of the bullet to make this work. So when aiming at a downward angle, the parabolic arc offsets the drop.
Regardless, pros don't go for head/neck shots. They aim for center mass.
I was just going off range, not angle. You're going to see slight drop at 150-200 yards. But, yes, angle changes things a bit.
Correct, but that's a whole other issue, because you could say there's zero bullet drop at 2000 yards, if zeroed to that. Point is, at 150 yards, you don't even need to zero, because drop is negligible. Of course you still should zero, but the impact of bullet drop isn't much either way.
I haven't confirmed, but apparently Charlie Kirk was wearing body armor, and the shot actually did hit center mass, before sadly ricocheting up to his neck.