Very wrong on the name change. It is the first time I truly want one of the Pauls to lose badly. This move will bring a tiny amount of honesty back to government. Although if you think about it his whiny argument aligns with libertarian/ancap principles. They claim to be nonviolent but can justify any atrocity if they have power. 'You violated the NAP. I may now obliterate you and force your women and children into indentured servitude. (not slavery, they will be made to sign contracts) Purely self-defense you see.' I also agree with completely and utterly obliterating my enemies, but I don't hide behind clean legalisms. Its war.
Rand Paul is very bearish on war, given that stance I think "department of defense" would become more honest by itself if his position where to come into power, so I don't think he's egregiously wrong.
Rand Paul very is wrong on immigration
Rand Paul is kinda wrong on the DoD/DoW name change
Rand Paul is kinda right about being anti-war and limiting military aid to Israel (he doesn't go far enough).
Rand Paul is very right about fiscal policy
Very wrong on the name change. It is the first time I truly want one of the Pauls to lose badly. This move will bring a tiny amount of honesty back to government. Although if you think about it his whiny argument aligns with libertarian/ancap principles. They claim to be nonviolent but can justify any atrocity if they have power. 'You violated the NAP. I may now obliterate you and force your women and children into indentured servitude. (not slavery, they will be made to sign contracts) Purely self-defense you see.' I also agree with completely and utterly obliterating my enemies, but I don't hide behind clean legalisms. Its war.
Rand Paul is very bearish on war, given that stance I think "department of defense" would become more honest by itself if his position where to come into power, so I don't think he's egregiously wrong.