Not really? Women aren't even capable of actual violence for the most part.
Even if you were to ignore psychological drivers of violence (rooted genetically so this isnt a nurture thing) you'd STILL have men committing most of the crime, because if a woman says "give me your cash or I'll break your leg" the liklihood of that bejng a credible threat approaches zero.
Well, you've already given 2% as a possibility, so no need for me to even make my own point.
But the implication that men will always prey on women is that men are inherently unsafe to be around because they will always be predators. It's a shitty view of men because it ignores the recognition of the majority of men who aren't predators.
Not really? Women aren't even capable of actual violence for the most part.
Even if you were to ignore psychological drivers of violence (rooted genetically so this isnt a nurture thing) you'd STILL have men committing most of the crime, because if a woman says "give me your cash or I'll break your leg" the liklihood of that bejng a credible threat approaches zero.
You would agree that men are always going to prey on women?
How would the inverse even be possible?
Genuinely how. Women aren't even dangerous without male support in 98% of situations.
Well, you've already given 2% as a possibility, so no need for me to even make my own point.
But the implication that men will always prey on women is that men are inherently unsafe to be around because they will always be predators. It's a shitty view of men because it ignores the recognition of the majority of men who aren't predators.