The headline statement does not appear in the news clip. In the clip:
Judge Cannon has ruled that Routh cannot access any classified information, citing risks to US national security.
The guy is representing himself, and is off his rocker, so he probably pulled some shit like "I want discovery on all of the presidents communications" and the judge said no. Of course we won't know for sure because this is now multi generation retard telephone from judge to court docs to news agency to copy writer to bimbo reader to twitter retard and now banned-from-reddit retard. Pretty safe bet that no one in that chain ever checked anything.
The headline statement does not appear in the news clip. In the clip:
The guy is representing himself, and is off his rocker, so he probably pulled some shit like "I want discovery on all of the presidents communications" and the judge said no. Of course we won't know for sure because this is now multi generation retard telephone from judge to court docs to news agency to copy writer to bimbo reader to twitter retard and now banned-from-reddit retard. Pretty safe bet that no one in that chain ever checked anything.
So, the headline is the opposite of reality? Typical journalists.
Thanks for that. As I could not see the content.
Easy workaround is to replace "twitter" with "xcancel" in the URL.
That's bullshit regardless of who the defendant is. The justice system should be transparent like all government.
Let me guess - Ukraine ordered Trump killed and the CIA was helping?
Putin ordered to kill him and ultra-right fascists provided the tools and duped an innocent boy into committing a crime.
I'm sure Trump could sign an EO to unclassify those if he wanted to.