This always weirds me out, and not just in relation to Nick Fuentes, but it's especially weird seeing it on this issue, because it's either people instinctively mirroring each other, or it's a psyop.
I've never seen Nick Fuentes described as specifically "absurdly talented" until recently, when Tucker praised him while calling him a gay basement dweller.
Honestly, the more people I see call Nick Fuentes "very talented, no matter what you think of him," the more my suspicion grows.
Is he? Maybe, I honestly don't watch him, so I wouldn't know. But what I have seem of him, he comes across as smarmy and unlikable. I could be missing some nuance, but you'd think if he was actually amazingly talented, he wouldn't have the 'gay femboy' reputation. Me? If I was insanely talented, and wanted to push my opinions on others, I'd be a strongman, I'd be a masculine leader, I'd be magnetic. Not a smug and obnoxious dude of indeterminate sexuality. Although, sure, maybe I'm missing something, and he's outplaying me. Honestly, there's a lot of men struggling out there, so maybe his whole "I'm a based chad, but also sort of a virgin loser" vibe plays well. I don't hate Fuentes, and I admit to not understanding him. But, I don't know, this whole "incredibly talented" thing strikes me as artificial.
It's like when I hear people tell me Obama, or Hitler, was charismatic. I don't speak German, so I can't comment on Hitler, but Obama was merely above average. He wasn't a genius. Fuentes also doesn't come across as a genius. Again, could be misreading things, and I'll allow he's above average, and is very competent in selling his brand, but this new thing of praising him for being generationally talented is a bit weird, if you ask me.
Yeah, Nick does it without a guest or a co-host. Or notes or a teleprompter AFAICT.
I'm actually surprised Nick is as popular as he is with his mostly room temperature IQ audience.
His main monologues can last two hours without interruption and go very deep into glowie & Jewish lore. They also start pretty late on the east coast because Nick is a faggot who can't keep a schedule.
His talks that aren't catty drama or mogging his groyper superchatters can be pretty dry.
The skill is impressive nonetheless but it can come off many times like a school lecture above the retention & comprehension of the average mouthbreather.
I'm actually surprised Nick is as popular as he is with his mostly room temperature IQ audience.
I'm not. The ability to put things to words that his audience feels deep down but can't quite articulate is a very powerful thing. It's the very reason that the establishment is always pushing for censorship.
This always weirds me out, and not just in relation to Nick Fuentes, but it's especially weird seeing it on this issue, because it's either people instinctively mirroring each other, or it's a psyop.
I've never seen Nick Fuentes described as specifically "absurdly talented" until recently, when Tucker praised him while calling him a gay basement dweller.
Honestly, the more people I see call Nick Fuentes "very talented, no matter what you think of him," the more my suspicion grows.
Is he? Maybe, I honestly don't watch him, so I wouldn't know. But what I have seem of him, he comes across as smarmy and unlikable. I could be missing some nuance, but you'd think if he was actually amazingly talented, he wouldn't have the 'gay femboy' reputation. Me? If I was insanely talented, and wanted to push my opinions on others, I'd be a strongman, I'd be a masculine leader, I'd be magnetic. Not a smug and obnoxious dude of indeterminate sexuality. Although, sure, maybe I'm missing something, and he's outplaying me. Honestly, there's a lot of men struggling out there, so maybe his whole "I'm a based chad, but also sort of a virgin loser" vibe plays well. I don't hate Fuentes, and I admit to not understanding him. But, I don't know, this whole "incredibly talented" thing strikes me as artificial.
It's like when I hear people tell me Obama, or Hitler, was charismatic. I don't speak German, so I can't comment on Hitler, but Obama was merely above average. He wasn't a genius. Fuentes also doesn't come across as a genius. Again, could be misreading things, and I'll allow he's above average, and is very competent in selling his brand, but this new thing of praising him for being generationally talented is a bit weird, if you ask me.
Because he can riff in front of a camera smoothly and coherently. His talent is for rhetoric.
Set a camera on record and try it yourself. Pay me a dollar for every um and uh you make. Stop when you get to $100.
Yeah, Nick does it without a guest or a co-host. Or notes or a teleprompter AFAICT.
I'm actually surprised Nick is as popular as he is with his mostly room temperature IQ audience.
His main monologues can last two hours without interruption and go very deep into glowie & Jewish lore. They also start pretty late on the east coast because Nick is a faggot who can't keep a schedule.
His talks that aren't catty drama or mogging his groyper superchatters can be pretty dry.
The skill is impressive nonetheless but it can come off many times like a school lecture above the retention & comprehension of the average mouthbreather.
I'm not. The ability to put things to words that his audience feels deep down but can't quite articulate is a very powerful thing. It's the very reason that the establishment is always pushing for censorship.