Yes. "A" (singular) strike of 2 (two) shells or bombs. ONE strike to remove the threat. The number of rounds is immaterial
I suspected as much, you don't even know what a double-tap strike is.
They hit the target and nothing else, a minimum of damages, proportional!
And you don't know what proportionality is, either. Murdering 20 people for a camera at a hospital is not proportionate, which is a judgment of how much military advantage vs. the non-military damage, dimwit. Then again, this shows why your non-people were known to be the most brutal concentration camp guards, you have zero regard for human life.
You ignore my question: was the entire hospital destroyed?
It's a stupid question. But then again, few things you do are not stupid.
A (singular) double-tap strike (singular)
Every time you repeat this? You prove my point. An airstrike, like the one on Dresden say, was not 1 bomber with 1 bomb. Nor was it 900 strikes, it was a singular event over 3 days.
A "double-tap strike" is a singular EVENT.
Do you even English?
Did I say "Geneva Convention? Did I? No. So stop changing the subject. Find a war with "proportionality" in it. There have been none, since no one agrees what that even entails.
Blow Up: Noun:
2: to rend apart, shatter, or destroy by explosion (MW Dictionary)
Not "damage", destroy. They blew up a room or two, but that's not the entire hospital. They blew up PART of a hospital, but that's not your claim.
No, it's not. Even after it was pointed out to you TWICE, you're still too retarded to figure out that there's something amiss with your understanding. A double-tap strike is not a literal double tap (duh), it's when you send a second shell after 15 minutes to kill the rescue workers and neighbors who have rushed to help the people.
Dumbass.
Do you even English?
Maybe I should put it in Slavic peasant dialect so that you can understand.
Did I say "Geneva Convention? Did I?
I did. Because you started saying that there was no proportionality during the Sack of Troy. Well, was Mycene a signatory to the Geneva Conventions? Idiot.
There have been none, since no one agrees what that even entails.
You, like a blind squirrel, accidentally stumbled on a point here. With the truly hard questions, it will be difficult to get people to agree. There are other cases in which it's cut and dry though, as here.
Not "damage", destroy. They blew up a room or two, but that's not the entire hospital. They blew up PART of a hospital, but that's not your claim.
And here you have a good point as well. I... do sometimes exaggerate a bit. But it's not really relevant to the point. Firing a shell at a hospital and killing 20 people, let alone double tapping a hospital, over a camera is clearly disporportioate.
I suspected as much, you don't even know what a double-tap strike is.
And you don't know what proportionality is, either. Murdering 20 people for a camera at a hospital is not proportionate, which is a judgment of how much military advantage vs. the non-military damage, dimwit. Then again, this shows why your non-people were known to be the most brutal concentration camp guards, you have zero regard for human life.
It's a stupid question. But then again, few things you do are not stupid.
A (singular) strike (singular).
That's one strike, the number of shells or bombs is still immaterial.
Again: did the IDF destroy the hospital like you falsely claimed? Or will you continue to ignore clear & simple questions?
Again: show me where "proportionality" has existed in any previous conflict. You pull shit out of your ass & say it's a flower? No it's still shit.
Even after it's pointed out to him that he doesn't know what a double-tap strike is, he doesn't even bother to check. Literal retard.
The only use of the word 'destroy' is from a kholkhol who shall remain nameless. I said that they blew up a hospital, and they did.
Like the mythical sack of Troy? You had to go back to 1200 BC because you don't understand that the Geneva Conventions don't go backward in time.
A (singular) double-tap strike (singular)
Every time you repeat this? You prove my point. An airstrike, like the one on Dresden say, was not 1 bomber with 1 bomb. Nor was it 900 strikes, it was a singular event over 3 days.
A "double-tap strike" is a singular EVENT.
Do you even English?
Did I say "Geneva Convention? Did I? No. So stop changing the subject. Find a war with "proportionality" in it. There have been none, since no one agrees what that even entails.
Blow Up: Noun:
Not "damage", destroy. They blew up a room or two, but that's not the entire hospital. They blew up PART of a hospital, but that's not your claim.
No, it's not. Even after it was pointed out to you TWICE, you're still too retarded to figure out that there's something amiss with your understanding. A double-tap strike is not a literal double tap (duh), it's when you send a second shell after 15 minutes to kill the rescue workers and neighbors who have rushed to help the people.
Dumbass.
Maybe I should put it in Slavic peasant dialect so that you can understand.
I did. Because you started saying that there was no proportionality during the Sack of Troy. Well, was Mycene a signatory to the Geneva Conventions? Idiot.
You, like a blind squirrel, accidentally stumbled on a point here. With the truly hard questions, it will be difficult to get people to agree. There are other cases in which it's cut and dry though, as here.
And here you have a good point as well. I... do sometimes exaggerate a bit. But it's not really relevant to the point. Firing a shell at a hospital and killing 20 people, let alone double tapping a hospital, over a camera is clearly disporportioate.