Find me "proportionality" in any previous war in history. Were the Greeks "proportional" at Troy?
Was the Trojan War before or after the signing of the Geneva Conventions, Ivan the Terribly Stupid? My God. A toddler could make better arguments.
The USSR EVER?
Why, yes, I think that when they kicked your sorry, treasonous, concentration camp guard asses, they were being very proportionate.
No, they blew the target up and stopped.
Except that they didn't. It was a 'double-tap' strike.
And not that firing shells at a hospital over a camera would be proportionate.
Willfully stupid is no way to be, and your ignorance on things you regurgitate leftist talking points about is no excuse.
It's adorable when you try to bash "leftists" or "Obama" to get justify your loyalty to a foreign power committing war crimes, aggression and mass murder.
Except that they didn't. It was a 'double-tap' strike.
Yes. "A" (singular) strike of 2 (two) shells or bombs. ONE strike to remove the threat. The number of rounds is immaterial. The location they hit IS. They hit the target and nothing else, a minimum of damages, proportional!
You ignore my question: was the entire hospital destroyed? You never actually address direct question, like the whiney little pedant you always are.
Yes. "A" (singular) strike of 2 (two) shells or bombs. ONE strike to remove the threat. The number of rounds is immaterial
I suspected as much, you don't even know what a double-tap strike is.
They hit the target and nothing else, a minimum of damages, proportional!
And you don't know what proportionality is, either. Murdering 20 people for a camera at a hospital is not proportionate, which is a judgment of how much military advantage vs. the non-military damage, dimwit. Then again, this shows why your non-people were known to be the most brutal concentration camp guards, you have zero regard for human life.
You ignore my question: was the entire hospital destroyed?
It's a stupid question. But then again, few things you do are not stupid.
Was the Trojan War before or after the signing of the Geneva Conventions, Ivan the Terribly Stupid? My God. A toddler could make better arguments.
Why, yes, I think that when they kicked your sorry, treasonous, concentration camp guard asses, they were being very proportionate.
Except that they didn't. It was a 'double-tap' strike.
And not that firing shells at a hospital over a camera would be proportionate.
It's adorable when you try to bash "leftists" or "Obama" to get justify your loyalty to a foreign power committing war crimes, aggression and mass murder.
Yes. "A" (singular) strike of 2 (two) shells or bombs. ONE strike to remove the threat. The number of rounds is immaterial. The location they hit IS. They hit the target and nothing else, a minimum of damages, proportional!
You ignore my question: was the entire hospital destroyed? You never actually address direct question, like the whiney little pedant you always are.
I suspected as much, you don't even know what a double-tap strike is.
And you don't know what proportionality is, either. Murdering 20 people for a camera at a hospital is not proportionate, which is a judgment of how much military advantage vs. the non-military damage, dimwit. Then again, this shows why your non-people were known to be the most brutal concentration camp guards, you have zero regard for human life.
It's a stupid question. But then again, few things you do are not stupid.
A (singular) strike (singular).
That's one strike, the number of shells or bombs is still immaterial.
Again: did the IDF destroy the hospital like you falsely claimed? Or will you continue to ignore clear & simple questions?
Again: show me where "proportionality" has existed in any previous conflict. You pull shit out of your ass & say it's a flower? No it's still shit.
Even after it's pointed out to him that he doesn't know what a double-tap strike is, he doesn't even bother to check. Literal retard.
The only use of the word 'destroy' is from a kholkhol who shall remain nameless. I said that they blew up a hospital, and they did.
Like the mythical sack of Troy? You had to go back to 1200 BC because you don't understand that the Geneva Conventions don't go backward in time.