Mostly a shit post. Still after watching court dramas and remembering in civics talking about how supernatural explanations are difficult to use as reasonable doubt. What would happen if supernatural entities were proven a fact?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
I'm talking about the standard of reasonable doubt. If ghost possession was a known phenomenon, like an absolute certainty, would making an argument the ghost made me do it be within the realm of reasonable doubt?
As it is it's not really grounds for reasonable doubt that a ghost did it.
Oh I hadn't thought about possession. If it was a certainty, then I think that could be a reasonable doubt that could lead to acquittal, just like an insanity plea. I still think there would have to at least be some argument to show that someone likely was possessed, such as a psychological assessment to see if their "possessed" behavior was consistent with their usual behavior, if the human displayed knowledge that the human couldn't possibly have while possessed, or if there was any witness account of their head spinning around and their voice becoming deep and creepy during the supposed possession.
You’d scan the supposed possessee for residual traces of ectoplasm to confirm their story