Gave him a shot at explaining himself a with little bit more nuance and listened to him interviewing Andrew Doyle. And it looks like it's a lost cause of blind faith and retardation.
"We're in for some interesting times. I'm still keeping the faith that maybe more liberalism can save us" is a direct unironic quote. And they bitch and moan about the "woke right" more than they do the rapist invaders and pedophile infiltrators. Then have the gall to call anyone with an actual solution to those heinous crimes and the low-trust society that bred them irrational and stupid for not believing in "just add moar liberalism harder!" going any different the 2nd time
Nationalism was originally a liberal ideology. Unfortunately, because the positions of liberalism seem to be essentially random, they are now anti-nationalist. It's like the political equivalent of Brownian motion.
So ironically, yes, more 1820s era liberalism would help things.
There are some differences. Tribes tend to be relatively small. And for most times before 1800, people were much less averse to being ruled by people of different cultures, languages and ethnicities.
Gave him a shot at explaining himself a with little bit more nuance and listened to him interviewing Andrew Doyle. And it looks like it's a lost cause of blind faith and retardation.
"We're in for some interesting times. I'm still keeping the faith that maybe more liberalism can save us" is a direct unironic quote. And they bitch and moan about the "woke right" more than they do the rapist invaders and pedophile infiltrators. Then have the gall to call anyone with an actual solution to those heinous crimes and the low-trust society that bred them irrational and stupid for not believing in "just add moar liberalism harder!" going any different the 2nd time
Nationalism was originally a liberal ideology. Unfortunately, because the positions of liberalism seem to be essentially random, they are now anti-nationalist. It's like the political equivalent of Brownian motion.
So ironically, yes, more 1820s era liberalism would help things.
I'm pretty sure Nationalism is just a new label for the default state of humanity for thousands of years: "Hurray for my tribe!"
There are some differences. Tribes tend to be relatively small. And for most times before 1800, people were much less averse to being ruled by people of different cultures, languages and ethnicities.
A nation is just a larger tribe. The nation of Japan is just a tribe the size of the whole archipelago.