How does Deuteronomy 28 not completely refute all of Zionism?
(www.bible.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (72)
sorted by:
You shouldn’t lie:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud
Thats not a formal denunciation, and its also not in agreement with accounts in the NT. Could be any old Josh from Nazareth. There were certainly more than one. Jesus also wasn't stoned or hanged (which is it?), and wasn't given 40 days notice. Nice try tho.
How much more formal does it get than being present in your group’s founding document? By your logic America never formally rejected the monarchy. Get your head out of your ass.
The founding document of Judaism is the Tanakh. The Talmud is a collection of legal opinions written over several hundred years after the second temple fell. It is quite similar to reading a compendium of the Early Church Fathers, who also did not agree on all things. Always with the lies, this one.
Judaism died and was resurrected ~2,000 years ago. We’re talking about Rabbinical Judaism which was born ~400 years later in Babylon. It’s logical that you would attempt to conflate the two, as that’s the only way for a lie to survive, by being conflated with the truth by the willfully ignorant.