No, I mean constantly saying shit he doesn't mean and pretending things he doesn't care about are non-negotiable conditions for a trade deal, right up until it stops being convenient for him and he abandons them.
I don't think he's serious when he makes not recognizing a Palestinian state a condition for a trade deal with Canada. Not that it matters, because our government will never actually do that. Within a week, they'll have denied they were ever even considering it and Trump will be taking credit for making them back down. It's not hard to make Mark Carney look weak, because he is.
The most obvious recent example is where he and Vance both said in April that they wanted US review of UK speech laws that might effect American companies to be included in any deal they signed with the UK, but it wasn't. They agreed a deal two months later and the Online Harms Act went into effect anyway.
And so? He's supposed to get 100% of everything or else he's a failure? Is 100% perfection the measure you use for every politician? For yourself? 🤔 I think not.
By pattern of behavior that he has done thousands of times, do you mean doing shit for Jews and Israel?
No, I mean constantly saying shit he doesn't mean and pretending things he doesn't care about are non-negotiable conditions for a trade deal, right up until it stops being convenient for him and he abandons them.
There's zero reason to think he doesn't mean it when he shills for Israel. He does just about everything they want.
I don't think he's serious when he makes not recognizing a Palestinian state a condition for a trade deal with Canada. Not that it matters, because our government will never actually do that. Within a week, they'll have denied they were ever even considering it and Trump will be taking credit for making them back down. It's not hard to make Mark Carney look weak, because he is.
I do agree Canada won't recognize Palestine any time soon whether it's due to US pressure or not.
Give examples making your point non refutable, work in Cammy’s glorious posterior if possible.
The most obvious recent example is where he and Vance both said in April that they wanted US review of UK speech laws that might effect American companies to be included in any deal they signed with the UK, but it wasn't. They agreed a deal two months later and the Online Harms Act went into effect anyway.
They said that to fool Trump's base. Trump deceives his base all the time.
And so? He's supposed to get 100% of everything or else he's a failure? Is 100% perfection the measure you use for every politician? For yourself? 🤔 I think not.