His first post back:
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/19Bst56UZ2/x/c/4eVJrWIJWlF
The ban:
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/19Bst7NHP9/x/c/4eVKAH0i30c
The banned comment:
https://unscored.arete.network/c/KotakuInAction2/p/19Bst7NHP9/x/c/4eVJrb6uzIf/
I'm mostly just here to laugh at the drama, but for the record I think this was probably undeserved, and I was hoping for at least a couple more days of Imp shitting up the board with his nonsense, before the inevitable ban.
It's odd that "Blame women or shut up" is the part Dom objected to. Due to the phrasing, that doesn't seem to meet the usual (and retarded) R16 criteria. It seems like you can demand other people believe your theories about who is to blame for every ill in the world, the main focus is on actual personal opinions on those people.
Interestingly, the rest of Imp's comment is closer to a R16 violation:
A class with scientifically proven strong in-group biases will always end up doing the same thing. Women are the worst of these, with the strongest biases.
Anyway, as disappointing as this may be to some (and relieving to others), it really is ultimately Imp's fault. Imp will never be able to get out of his own way, and always makes these big sweeping generalizations that, no matter how we all feel about R16, are clear R16 violations. He would have been banned soon anyway, because he can't fucking help himself.
He could say practically the exact same things, with slightly different phrasing, and it would be fine, but he's so wrapped up in his over the top global female conspiracy that he just has to smash people in the face with his retarded and universal phrasing on the issue.
Anyway, I thought people would be interested to hear Imp got the boot again. 400 days, according to the mod logs. Not sure if that's a permaban or not, as I thought 365 was the max and next one was a perma. So we'll have to wait another year+ to see if Imp comes back to get banned again.
This has been your yearly Imp Update.
This is half true. Women can have the strongest in-group biases if they are “empowered” by society, and it is terrible for everyone when this happens.
The thing that Imp gets so wrong, however, is the completely asinine idea that you can solve for women’s in-group biases by banishing all of them from society. This strategy is retarded on its face. Women are a necessary condition that everyone must include in their societal calculus because they are literally required to propagate and sustain your culture, your people, and your nation. If you don’t have women, you’ve already lost.
This is where Imp’s other overt contribution to the board - pathological defense of Israel - becomes so hypocritical. Women are, again, a necessary condition for any nation. You know what isn’t a necessary condition? Being controlled by a deeply ethnocentric hostile foreign elite. You have to put up with some amount of women’s bullshit because you need to have kids. There’s no similar cost benefit analysis when it comes to AIPAC controlling your government.
Put another way; if in-group biases are a problem, then which group has the most brazen and harmful in-group biases while also being a completely unnecessary problem within your society? Because even if women are the worst and the most destructive, you still need them. But what about the second most biased and destructive group? Do you need to tolerate that influence?
To be very clear, this is not intended as eliminationist rhetoric. Unlike Israel, I’m not fond of genocide. The only thing that needs eliminating is the outsized influence of certain foreign demographics upon our cultures, governments, and nations. This doesn’t require violence, but it does require plain and unafraid language.
I guarantee you Jewish in group bias was overlooked in whatever studies he is talking about. It's not even something that's easy to study if you try, and modern studies wouldn't even try.
You don't even need to study it. Just have a conversation with one and they will let it slip. They can't help themselves.
Honestly, I don’t believe women do have the strongest in-group bias, even now. Just look at anything coming out of the UK around the Muslims. Every week we have a new video here of some woman rushing to defend a Muslim who’s losing a fight, and then you can also look at the way the Muslim women support their fathers and husbands who are in the grooming gangs—not denial that he would do such a thing, but support for him doing it. Not to mention that there are plenty of female MPs complicit in the coverups. On the American side, one only needs to observe just how many women will go to bat for BLM, or the Innocence Project when they dredge up their latest rapist/robber/murderer to canonize.
Of course, Imp also insists that any racial strife if a feminist distraction, so it’s not like that would convince him of anything.