Just because you can argue that something at the most minimal and reductive observation from afarcould be legal, doesn't mean that you can't investigate whether or not it is legal. Particularly if you are intentionally ignoring the conspiracy thinking, abduction, social isolation, and paranoid delusions.
Cops take people's rights away as part of the due process of law. That's the point of enforcement.
You have rights when being arrested, the cops are even required to tell you them duh.
And you keep acting like being in a cult warrants mistreatment, it doesn't. And cops and prosecutors who misuse their authorities to investigate are breaking the law as well.
And yes if the authorities are attempting to unlawfully hurt you, you by God should fight back
Your rights are restricted when arrested, like your right to freedom of movement. I didn't say you don't have rights, you're moving the goal posts to make excuses for a fucking terrible conclusion.
Being in a cult is mistreatment for the members. Most of the time, they are actively committing crimes against their own members. A cult, which you are ignoring is arguing for a world ending war, is a damn good reason to investigate why they are stockpiling weapons.
It's no different from complaining that the cops shouldn't be "harassing people just because they are sitting on a stoop, or standing on a street corner" when referring to drug dealers and gangs preforming a show of force in a neighborhood. Yeah, if you fully de-contextualize everything the cop is doing to an abstract concept in a total vacuum, but what's actually happening is legal, correct, necessary, and moral.
You should fight back in court, but what you are trying to do is get the readers of these comments to interpret lawful police activities as unlawful based on their subjective assumption, and then follow it up with violence that you fantasize isn't criminal, but absolutely will be.
Just because you can argue that something at the most minimal and reductive observation from afar could be legal, doesn't mean that you can't investigate whether or not it is legal. Particularly if you are intentionally ignoring the conspiracy thinking, abduction, social isolation, and paranoid delusions.
Cops take people's rights away as part of the due process of law. That's the point of enforcement.
So no.
You have rights when being arrested, the cops are even required to tell you them duh.
And you keep acting like being in a cult warrants mistreatment, it doesn't. And cops and prosecutors who misuse their authorities to investigate are breaking the law as well.
And yes if the authorities are attempting to unlawfully hurt you, you by God should fight back
Your rights are restricted when arrested, like your right to freedom of movement. I didn't say you don't have rights, you're moving the goal posts to make excuses for a fucking terrible conclusion.
Being in a cult is mistreatment for the members. Most of the time, they are actively committing crimes against their own members. A cult, which you are ignoring is arguing for a world ending war, is a damn good reason to investigate why they are stockpiling weapons.
It's no different from complaining that the cops shouldn't be "harassing people just because they are sitting on a stoop, or standing on a street corner" when referring to drug dealers and gangs preforming a show of force in a neighborhood. Yeah, if you fully de-contextualize everything the cop is doing to an abstract concept in a total vacuum, but what's actually happening is legal, correct, necessary, and moral.
You should fight back in court, but what you are trying to do is get the readers of these comments to interpret lawful police activities as unlawful based on their subjective assumption, and then follow it up with violence that you fantasize isn't criminal, but absolutely will be.
I didn't move the goalposts, you said cops have the ability to remove rights to arrest people. I said they do not, how is that moving a goalpost?