This law has nothing to do with faggotry books in schools. That’s a separate fight, and everyone on the right is on board with that one—including the people who have immediately been proven correct in saying this law would be used to censor things that aren’t porn.
I read it as calling the other commenters leftists for being opposed to censorship of porn, but you’re right that that could be a misreading of the intent.
Like Amish said, it's an example of what the left thinks is bad to censor as opposed to reality. So yes, the new law in the hands of the left will immediately be used for nefarious purposes. They'll tell the majority that we're wrong them ban us from talking about it. Like all leftist ideas, it's all about control, power and destroying what is good.
This law has nothing to do with faggotry books in schools. That’s a separate fight, and everyone on the right is on board with that one—including the people who have immediately been proven correct in saying this law would be used to censor things that aren’t porn.
She's talking about what the left says though, they very much conflate those issues.
I read it as calling the other commenters leftists for being opposed to censorship of porn, but you’re right that that could be a misreading of the intent.
No, most folks here are smart enough to know that giving p0rn to little kids is bad. But that's one of the left's top dogmas these days.
Like Amish said, it's an example of what the left thinks is bad to censor as opposed to reality. So yes, the new law in the hands of the left will immediately be used for nefarious purposes. They'll tell the majority that we're wrong them ban us from talking about it. Like all leftist ideas, it's all about control, power and destroying what is good.