The damage to civilian infrastructure was minimal. How many power stations were destroyed? How many bridges? How many aquifers? How many ports? How many rail stations?
You have significant damage to specific buildings. The damage to areas and neighborhoods is minimal.
Forays require invasions. The issue is not one of scale.
Yes. Because mass immigration is intended to
so you've rejected your own definition. No military units were involved, it couldn't have been an invasion. Just like the Democrats are arguing.
I'm just gonna assume that you do not understand how language works. Maybe I should ask you how you would feel if you hadn't eaten breakfast this morning.
The damage to civilian infrastructure was minimal. How many power stations were destroyed? How many bridges? How many aquifers? How many ports? How many rail stations?
You have significant damage to specific buildings. The damage to areas and neighborhoods is minimal.
Forays require invasions. The issue is not one of scale.
so you've rejected your own definition. No military units were involved, it couldn't have been an invasion. Just like the Democrats are arguing.
I'm just gonna assume that you do not understand how language works. Maybe I should ask you how you would feel if you hadn't eaten breakfast this morning.