According to Ted Cruz Iran wants to kill Americans. But he hasn't told us why. Maybe he would say "its because Iran is muslim and muslims hate non muslims" Except why doesn't Iran want to kill all Chinese?
Maybe Ted Cruz could say "Iran hates Christians" well then why is Iran friendly with Russia which is more Christian than America? Russia is 73% Christian (71% Orthodox) and America is 63% Christian a big chunk of which are liberals or don't follow any strict Christian tradition.
Why doesn't Iran chant "death to China" or "death to Russia? Instead they have a working relationship with these 2 countries. And this is despite China's immense persecution against the muslim Uyghur population
Why won't Ted Cruz answer these questions?
Also what is "Americans"? Does Iran want to kill Iranian Americans? or does "Americans" only mean White people? Ted Cruz statement implies that "Americans" mean "Whites" Yet Ted Cruz doesn't support White nationalists and insults them.
You can reject both , while still understanding that when they are in a conflict with each other that one is clearly the bigger aggressor.
Like i said before. Look at Singapore. Singapore is surrounded by muslim countries and yet isn't at war with any of them . Unlike Israel .
You're arguing with a religious fanatic. What exactly do you hope to gain from that?
he isn't just a religious fanatic. He was apparently part of the army and he fought muslims for israel's sake so he needs to feel like his wars actually meant something.
Oh no he's quite right, I am a fundamentalist, traditionalist Catholic who views no other religion as valid, or even vaguely truthful.
I hated muslims long before I ever had to fight them in warfare. My experiences with them merely proved to me that they are incapable of humanity. You know, the whole using children as suicide bombers thing. Or was that also the israelis?
When you invade a country unprovoked and start killing the people you're not exactly in a position to complain about how they choose to resist against you being there.
Gotta make your religious fanaticism fit reality somehow.
And I do.
There is no weighing illegitimate actors. Neither can be worse or better than the other, because they're both equally damned. Each is guilty of countless crimes against Christendom lasting more than a millennia, far outweighing whatever petty nonsense and trivial squabbling exists in the past decade, or however far back into the 20th century you want to count.
You are asking me which scorpion I want to pick up and pet, and give to my kids to play with.
Neither. In fact, given my druthers I'd kill both scorpions with a shovel.
No one looks at Singapore, nobody gives a good goddamn about them besides themselves, and maybe a handful of newsie faggots.
At best, if I take your point at face value, it proves nothing more than the only peace that can be had with mohammadans is slavish submission and groveling.
No thank you.
You don't want to look at Singapore because it would smash your arguement. Singapore not being at war with its muslim neighbours is proof that israel doesn't have to be at war with its neighbours and that israel are the aggressors. .
You didn't bother reading it then.
Islam is at war with all human life. The different degrees to which they are, or are not attacking one particular group, is just a matter of time.
I'm a quarter Castillian Spanish. You're not going to get any sympathy from me for mohammadan dogs. Were it up to me, I'd wipe out their entire religion and their misbegotten race.
Muslims aren't a race. Neither are Christians. Only Jews are.
Btw Christianity and Islam are offshoots of Judaism. Without Judaism there is no Christianity or Islam.
Like i said. How do you explain Singapore?
No one said you needed to accept muslims, especially not in your own lands. But my point is that in the Middle East Region specifically its obvious that Israel is the biggest aggressor in the region.