Math is in fact tangible, not sure what you’re trying to say there unless you’re talking theoretical mathematics and even then it’s not a great argument.
Moral relativism is a redundant concept and it really only works in the head of atheists and people who believe truth is subjective. If truth is objective, however, moral relativism is a lazy approach to saying not everyone is willing to accept truth and in accordance to that, we should accept their lies.
Also your favorite author is retarded, I could inject you with numerous drugs to make you feel mercy. dopamine, serotonin, oxytocin, and endorphins are what constitute our ability to be calm and feel affection or mercy for others. Our amygdala and prefrontal cortex flare up when we sense unfairness, this is true of crimes committed against you or ones you see of others. What causes ability to feel mercy and justice are, in fact, tangible.
You're missing the point. The author is saying nature is amoral because morality is a human concept. Has nothing to do with chemicals or whatever the fuck you're interpreting it as.
You’re missing the point. Humans are hardwired to be moral creatures, we’re also not alone in this aspect, there’s multiple mammals that have a sense of fairness hardwired into them which makes NATURE moral. Morality exists objectively, it is not a subjective human creation.
if morality is a "consequence of civilization" then what is civilization a consequence of?
culture is downstream from genes. nature made us care first, then we codified it. an amoral killer caveman did not wake up one day and decide to carve some rules into his walls to follow just because.
Math is in fact tangible, not sure what you’re trying to say there unless you’re talking theoretical mathematics and even then it’s not a great argument.
Moral relativism is a redundant concept and it really only works in the head of atheists and people who believe truth is subjective. If truth is objective, however, moral relativism is a lazy approach to saying not everyone is willing to accept truth and in accordance to that, we should accept their lies.
Also your favorite author is retarded, I could inject you with numerous drugs to make you feel mercy. dopamine, serotonin, oxytocin, and endorphins are what constitute our ability to be calm and feel affection or mercy for others. Our amygdala and prefrontal cortex flare up when we sense unfairness, this is true of crimes committed against you or ones you see of others. What causes ability to feel mercy and justice are, in fact, tangible.
You're missing the point. The author is saying nature is amoral because morality is a human concept. Has nothing to do with chemicals or whatever the fuck you're interpreting it as.
You’re missing the point. Humans are hardwired to be moral creatures, we’re also not alone in this aspect, there’s multiple mammals that have a sense of fairness hardwired into them which makes NATURE moral. Morality exists objectively, it is not a subjective human creation.
humans coming from nature throws the finest monkey wrench into his finest sieve.
Yea and different humans have different moral systems, and many dont have any at all. Morality is a consquence of civilization
if morality is a "consequence of civilization" then what is civilization a consequence of?
culture is downstream from genes. nature made us care first, then we codified it. an amoral killer caveman did not wake up one day and decide to carve some rules into his walls to follow just because.