Muzzies always lie to make themselves seem more popular
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
I mean it's not entirely untrue, wimples also looked like that and were commonplace for medieval british women, and they were worn predominantly for religious modesty reasons.
The real question is why they're trying to relate to modern British by invoking their medieval history, when another key point of medieval history is Britain and Muslim nations regularly engaging in kill on sight warfare because of their intense incompatibility.
yeah like the muslims want to talk about the olden day traditionalist Christian cultures that covered up the woman's head in a similar way that muslim women do , while not bringing up the fact that these traditionalist Christians will also be expeling all non Christians from the land because that's what traditional Christians also did in the olden days.
She calls it a hijab. Its not like headcoverings were unknown to europeans, but for the sake of not being retarded, shes pretty much calling it a hijab
I have no idea why this is apparently a hard concept to get
Well if you do want an idea probably the best place to start is examining why you think the name is somehow more important than the physical form and intent of the garb.
Foreign people use foreign words, shocking. But going "Haha, no we didn't drink l'eau, we drank water" is an embarrassing way to argue back. Tighten up that rhetoric if you don't want to make their evangelists look better instead of worse like you should.
Even if you want to compare the intent, its completely different, the same way a nun habit is already different. Youre not being intelligent by going oh yeah theyre both head coverings or religious headcoverings. Everyone knows that. Youre just coming off as pretentiously
You say that they're completely different, but in what ways? They're both female head coverings worn because showing your hair was considered immodest for religious reasons.
Why not point out those differences instead of "foreign word bad!" and giving away an own goal to the invaders claiming people who oppose them are just ignorant racists with no real arguments? It doesn't matter too much when you're preaching to the choir here, but if you ever intend to actually influence public opinion in the wild, saying dumb stuff like that will only make them more sympathetic to centrist normies with naive bleeding hearts.
https://istizada.com/muslim-veil-and-hijab-types-a-complete-guide/
Just scroll down to look at the chart. This Xweeting liar is intentionally making shit up about the hijab while there are people trying to tell everyone they're bigots for calling everything a hijab. Odd.
The key point you mentioned is something most people dont know because people are criminally ignorant of history.