EU condemns the execution of a 9 times rapist and killer
(www.eeas.europa.eu)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Yes I had become a little heated. Its called I realized I'm talking to someone so idiotic that he wants to let the cops kidnap and beat people because he got hurt one time. That's a level of stupid so bad its indistinguishable from evil, so I am treating it as an such. You deserve no kindness or politeness, and should probably kill yourself.
No, you said "if they let me!" That's the important part there. You need permission from them to go do it, while arguing they shouldn't need permission themselves. You want them to break the law and are gleeful they do so because it might help something, while you need them to come tell you its okay and allowed for you to join in.
The fact that you don't see how childish and weak that makes you look is also alarming.
Ah yes, we should apply the methods necessary to wrangle a country of monkeys that has already devolved into anarchy into our already struggling "civilized" nations.
Let's just skip the formalities and just shoot everyone we don't like. Why even bother with all these cops? If a nigger looks suspicious to you, end him.
And you're still heated. I think there's a fair difference between cops should kidnap and beat people and cops should be allowed to beat criminals.
I actually think victims should be allowed to beat their perpertrators and this should be an actual law. Murder victim families should be allowed to throw the switch or inject the poison into the murderer, people who got mugged or robbed should get to beat the robber. No apologies for this. Why should we prioritise the welfare of the crminal
Civilization is a thin veneer. I've seen what happens to the civilised nations right now and frankly, we'd have been better off letting cops beat criminals. Why don't you ask yourself whether you think the streets are safer now that criminals have so much rights or back when they were afraid of cops.
And when does he become a criminal? After the conviction? He is already heading to prison then, its useless barbarism then. After the charge? Since you are in favor of lowering the bar to charging people more, that's just letting them beat people with an extra piece of paperwork. Before the charge? That's the Japan one and that's not a criminal in the slightest.
They already have many rules to allow them to beat when necessary, and they are still killing random, innocent people because they can barely restrain themselves. And yet you want laxer.
No disagreement on this point. But I'd also include any false accuser including law enforcers. If the law tried to set you up you should be in your right to beat the cop, the judge, and maybe even the prosecutor.
Because tomorrow you could be the criminal. Whether by the changing current of society or because of someone with an axe to grind. Its that little American idea like "protecting free speech means protecting the worst speech."
Yeah, because the law just being allowed to do whatever they liked worked out so well for the J6 guys and Derek Chauvin and during Covid. You keep talking like cops are these partisan and neutral force of goodness, and not a literal cudgel of the state. And that "criminal" would include us right now if our enemies had slightly more power.
When he commits the crime. You think him being convicted in a court of law makes him a criminal? Was OJ not a criminal then since he was never convicted in a court of law?
Uh huh. How many deaths have the japanese police been responsible for over the last five years that were the result of them beating people? What percentage?
Let's settle it this way. You beat criminals who mug/rape/rob/kill/extort people. We can discuss the beating of others when laws come up criminalising actions
You act like those 3 weren't all political. you think the cops were the ones who initiated the hunt for j6? or for derek chauvin? Or who made all the stupid rules on covid?
Cops do whatever those on top tell them to do. And let's not even get into what I think corrupt govt officlas and politicians who use statepowers to hunt down political enemies or rivals should get.
And all of these laws and restrictions and hoops to jump through are to prove that someone actually committed a crime. So we are back to the original problem, you don't see an issue if innocent people get hurt as long as more criminals suffer along the way.
No idea, don't live in Japan. We are talking about an issue bigger than one country, with theirs as just an example of one of the abuses. Considering you just brought up OJ in the last sentence, you know this and are just trying to restrict it down to win an argument.
Your trauma is showing when you list what happened to you first before raping and killing, and completely skip assault to make sure that you list it twice (all muggings are robberies, its a specific type of robbing).
And we aren't settling shit that way. If cops get to beat anyone they suspect are criminals, we get to beat them if it turns out we aren't.
All cops are government employees, which means their use and deployment is entirely and always political. Including what constitutes breaking the law and what makes you a criminal. Which is one of the problems with your entire idea. They are not weapons that exist to catch and punish criminals in a morally neutral, bipartisan sense. They are flawed men acting as the arm of a system you yourself have just said is being used in a horrible, evil fashion.
So why should we give them more freedom to charge and brutalize us? They do not exist in a vacuum, so are agreeing with all those perversities of justice being acceptable by saying they should have more power.