I've railed against Dispensationalists before, in particular evangelicals, and here we have the confessions of one who was one, but has now seen the light.
Original: https://revmatthewlittlefield.substack.com/p/inside-the-mindset-of-a-christian
Archive: https://archive.is/dzLBt
Read that and really understand how deep Jews have gotten their hooks into those people. Sadly, there is no saving most of them, they are just too far gone. Thankfully, their power is waning, because, being mostly boomers, they are rapidly dying off.
Unicef:
You're really scratching the bottom of the barrel now. You really comparing a country closing their OWN border with the de facto complete control Israel has over Gazas borders?
But hey if Israel doesn't control what gets in from Egypt, Egypt could just say 'Fuck you' to Israel and ship anything they want to into Gaza. Right? Oh... oh well.
Hohoho. You haven't been consistent at all.
So Israel has de facto control over gaza? But if south africa closes their OWN borders with Lesotho and their OWN surrounding airspace, south africa isn't occupying them? They have 'de facto' control so by your reasoning: yes. But you can't acknowledge this.
But the border isn't closed: so what you're saying isn't control determines occupation but permission. No one has the right to enter another country.
Further, yes Egypt had the ability to allow unlimited food/medicine etc to gaza via the rafah border. So what's the argument here? They didn't get guns through and that makes it an occupation? Right... Go take a gun through any border.
And before you try to say they didn't get enough: https://www.anera.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Gaza-population-735x1024.jpg.webp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Palestine#/media/File:Life_expectancy_by_WBG_-West_Bank_and_Gaza_-diff.png
If I stood blocking you from getting to the toilet and told you it's occupied: of course you'd say "No it isn't: I can' see there's no one in there! I need to poop." Because a blockade is not an occupation. Redefining words won't make you right.
You know, I can admit Israel is wrong to do it's settler-advancing violence, but you can't admit gaza is wrong to keep attacking israel because in your mind if it is an occupation that justifies gazan violence against israel.
Yes.
Is Israel only controlling their own borders? Is Israel only controlling their own airspace? No. Israel controls the airspace and territorial waters of Gaza. And they prevent Gaza from using them.
But yes if South Africa would impose a total blockade of Lesotho that would be an act of war. Not an occupation as Gaza is 365km² and Lesotho is slightly bigger at 30.355km². At that size you can't really exert total control by a blockade. Apples and oranges.
The argument is that Israel decides what and who gets in. Not Egypt.
This is public information.
But it's not wrong in displacing Palestinians and stealing their land I guess. Just the violence part. Similar to how Muslims 'disavow' violent extremists but don't actual disavow the goals of those extremists because they agree with them.
Palestinians have a right to defend themselves. But I guess they could've chosen the way of slowly and violently getting displaced by Israeli settlers like the West Bank did.
Btw Hamas was not only created with the help of Israel but was also financed by Israel. You think the Qatari would've been able to funnel billions into Gaza without Israels approval? If you don't believe me just look up a few Israeli newspapers. It's an open secret.