It's not about porn. The jews want everything on the Internet to be directly linked to the person who posted it, so they can punish you for posting "antisemitic hate speech" on a forum like this one. Porn is just the pretext being used to get there.
You're just inventing a story. You can go to the supreme court website and view who supported which side in the Amicus Curae.
Spoiler: a bunch of jewed and woke organizations on the opposition side (free speech), and a bunch of christian and right wing organizations on the support side (ban porn for children).
Your narrative is demonstrably false. Here's a counter-narrative that actually aligns with the facts: "The jews oppose ID on the internet, because they're the by far biggest users of astrturf and bots to push propaganda. With only real users online, everyone will get j-pilled really fast." It's far more in-line with the facts than this being some 5D chess to secretly support it while opposing it (though, I think they just want to push porn, no extra explanation required).
There are actually ways to verify identity without disclosing identity in any uniquely identifiable way. It's what basically every 2FA app does, so this isn't some obscure or unfamiliar technology.
Since this is possible to do, yet it is never proposed or required whenever discussing age verification online, it's fair to characterize all of these efforts as an attempt to deliberately strip anonymity (for tyrannical purposes).
The precise actors in question are kind of irrelevant to the point here. The GayRaceCommunistZOG dialectic is all about creating, "Heads I win, Tails you lose" situations and this is no better. Either unrestricted access to hardcore porn for minors, or tyrannical speech-control across the entire internet.
Just search it for "jew" and you'll find the jewish involvement.
And the "Christian" organizations listed in that same brief include the Zionist National Association of Evangelicals.
I've never heard of most of the organizations and individuals that filed briefs, but it's not a secret that most prominent right-wing people in America are Zionist wall-kissers. Texas also has anti-BDS laws, passed by the same right-wing politicians.
judeo Christians strike again!
Judeo-anything is the side trying to support porn, not ban it.
It's not about porn. The jews want everything on the Internet to be directly linked to the person who posted it, so they can punish you for posting "antisemitic hate speech" on a forum like this one. Porn is just the pretext being used to get there.
You're just inventing a story. You can go to the supreme court website and view who supported which side in the Amicus Curae.
Spoiler: a bunch of jewed and woke organizations on the opposition side (free speech), and a bunch of christian and right wing organizations on the support side (ban porn for children).
Your narrative is demonstrably false. Here's a counter-narrative that actually aligns with the facts: "The jews oppose ID on the internet, because they're the by far biggest users of astrturf and bots to push propaganda. With only real users online, everyone will get j-pilled really fast." It's far more in-line with the facts than this being some 5D chess to secretly support it while opposing it (though, I think they just want to push porn, no extra explanation required).
There are actually ways to verify identity without disclosing identity in any uniquely identifiable way. It's what basically every 2FA app does, so this isn't some obscure or unfamiliar technology.
Since this is possible to do, yet it is never proposed or required whenever discussing age verification online, it's fair to characterize all of these efforts as an attempt to deliberately strip anonymity (for tyrannical purposes).
The precise actors in question are kind of irrelevant to the point here. The GayRaceCommunistZOG dialectic is all about creating, "Heads I win, Tails you lose" situations and this is no better. Either unrestricted access to hardcore porn for minors, or tyrannical speech-control across the entire internet.
Those aren't the only options.
Here's one of the briefs in favor of the law:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-1122/332650/20241122182608914_FSC%20v%20Paxton%20Brief%20of%20Amici%20Curiae%20Major%20Religious%20Orgs.pdf
Just search it for "jew" and you'll find the jewish involvement.
And the "Christian" organizations listed in that same brief include the Zionist National Association of Evangelicals.
I've never heard of most of the organizations and individuals that filed briefs, but it's not a secret that most prominent right-wing people in America are Zionist wall-kissers. Texas also has anti-BDS laws, passed by the same right-wing politicians.
You'll live lib