I'm going to try to put this in a hypothetical that you can understand.
Say some guy rapes your daughter and threatens to rape her again and the cops won't do anything. You know you have to protect your daughter and you have a gun. The guy loafs around on his porch all day and is an easy target.
The point of this scenario is that it's unimpeachably moral and you have a duty to act, just as you see us and Iran.
According to you, all that is needed is to stroll over to the guy's porch and blow him away as soon as possible. Are the cops going to arrest you? Who's going to provide for your daughter? Do you have a criminal lawyer? Is there a way you could better accomplish this? Nah, consequences don't matter. Me kill rapist.
I assume your response to this is something like, "decapitating Iran doesn't have any real consequences for the United States." Let's see if I'm right.
I struggle to articulate how retarded you are, but maybe you can understand a glimmer of it now?
Yeah, I could've mentioned the possibility of his friends and family burning down your house as well (or your friends' houses), but I think the point was made.
I was just anticipating more of a corollary with knowing the population/demographics of Iran before going to war and at least some premeditation of casing the joint to know who may be home when planning a crime of passion.
But I understand the angle of attack you went with for your hypothetical case as well.
No, the argument being made by cucker is more "but he's 30% black, does that make you feel different about killing him while he's raping your daughter".
You're a retard, and so is anyone who thinks his point is anything that matters.
So why does that change why they're getting bombed to shit?
It doesn't. This is all deflection and seething, nothing more.
I'm going to try to put this in a hypothetical that you can understand.
Say some guy rapes your daughter and threatens to rape her again and the cops won't do anything. You know you have to protect your daughter and you have a gun. The guy loafs around on his porch all day and is an easy target.
The point of this scenario is that it's unimpeachably moral and you have a duty to act, just as you see us and Iran.
According to you, all that is needed is to stroll over to the guy's porch and blow him away as soon as possible. Are the cops going to arrest you? Who's going to provide for your daughter? Do you have a criminal lawyer? Is there a way you could better accomplish this? Nah, consequences don't matter. Me kill rapist.
I assume your response to this is something like, "decapitating Iran doesn't have any real consequences for the United States." Let's see if I'm right.
I struggle to articulate how retarded you are, but maybe you can understand a glimmer of it now?
I thought your analogy was going to include how many homies are hanging out with him on his porch.
Or how many other occupants there are in the home you're about to go shoot up.
Yeah, I could've mentioned the possibility of his friends and family burning down your house as well (or your friends' houses), but I think the point was made.
I was just anticipating more of a corollary with knowing the population/demographics of Iran before going to war and at least some premeditation of casing the joint to know who may be home when planning a crime of passion.
But I understand the angle of attack you went with for your hypothetical case as well.
No, the argument being made by cucker is more "but he's 30% black, does that make you feel different about killing him while he's raping your daughter".
You're a retard, and so is anyone who thinks his point is anything that matters.
Can you respond to the point that we were discussing, not another completely different point, you idiot?
No, they never can.
I used your example, you inbred cocksucker.
I know you barely have 2 brain cells, but try to keep up.