Checked on Nick's timeline to see his reaction to the Battle of Los Angeles.
First post is complaining about the push against "third world immigration" using OP's screenshot. Second post is "haha people are attacking cops! This proves I was right to campaign against Trump!"
Someone should punch that little beaner in the mouth.
his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"
walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole. they are pretty much controlled opposition. otherwise please tell me how they are so based by only daring to voice this opinion in june of 2025 (ignoring the fact they all spammed identical-phrased slogan on the same day).
nick predicts that, come the next election year, they will simultaneously withdraw from and renounce these "extreme" views altogether in favour of a much more lenient and progressive take on immigration, only to take up the digital pitchfork once again and resume the rabble-rousing from the safety of the following inter-election season. once you start noticing these unnatural occurrences, aka patterns, you can never unnotice them.
i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.
nick predicts that, come the next election year, they will simultaneously withdraw from and renounce these "extreme" views altogether in favour of a much more lenient and progressive take on immigration
This is not a reason to countersignal them. Go with the flow and put pressure on them. Consensus of the public square is the weakest form of consensus, but it is necessary for stronger forms to cement.
i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.
So far Trump has kept us out of war with Iran, closed the border, ratcheted up deportations*, severely increased tariffs, restored Fort Bragg's name, championed the cause of WHITE South Africans, and declared war on DEI and trannies. This is infinitely better than Kamala and not voting for it was retarded.
Yes, Trump is in bed with the Jews and may advance Greater Israel. Everyone at that level is in bed with the Jews. Kamala would have done the same thing except worse and faster and btw climate lockdowns. Should we ask Santa Claus for something different? While your children get inducted into the tranny cult and raped?
Nick Fuentes has made absolutely no material improvements in anyone's life in the United States, and he will continue to make absolutely zero material improvements for the rest of his life. He's good at livestreaming, not fighting. He is an entertaining gay minstrel. Nothing more. (except possibly a fed)
*anyone claiming Biden's deport numbers were higher because of turnaways at the border is a complete moron.
walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole.
I wouldn't take that bet on Walsh. He has been saying some things lately that hint that he is closer to Candace Owens than Ben Shapiro as far as identifying the core problem.
i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently
So you are the perfect mark for Nick, the kind of person who only sees his "based" takes carefully curated to make him seem wise without knowing his massive history of faggotry, hypocrisy and selling out.
Literally everyone, on their own in this thread had the same perspective that these guys were suspicious and coordinated, without needing an e-daddy to tell them. Get your own opinions and thought processes instead of offloading the work onto a femboy fucking beaner.
words words words. amazing how vitriolic people get at the slightest mention of nick haha
can you inform me briefly on his hypocrisy and selling out? i'm genuinely interested because i can see he is a little sensationalist and hypocritic at times
Nick's complaint falls apart when Walsh has never said anything of the sort lmao. You're as big as faggot as he is. Kirk and Psobic tweeted in response to Walsh
Checked on Nick's timeline to see his reaction to the Battle of Los Angeles.
First post is complaining about the push against "third world immigration" using OP's screenshot. Second post is "haha people are attacking cops! This proves I was right to campaign against Trump!"
Someone should punch that little beaner in the mouth.
his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"
walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole. they are pretty much controlled opposition. otherwise please tell me how they are so based by only daring to voice this opinion in june of 2025 (ignoring the fact they all spammed identical-phrased slogan on the same day).
nick predicts that, come the next election year, they will simultaneously withdraw from and renounce these "extreme" views altogether in favour of a much more lenient and progressive take on immigration, only to take up the digital pitchfork once again and resume the rabble-rousing from the safety of the following inter-election season. once you start noticing these unnatural occurrences, aka patterns, you can never unnotice them.
i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.
This is not a reason to countersignal them. Go with the flow and put pressure on them. Consensus of the public square is the weakest form of consensus, but it is necessary for stronger forms to cement.
So far Trump has kept us out of war with Iran, closed the border, ratcheted up deportations*, severely increased tariffs, restored Fort Bragg's name, championed the cause of WHITE South Africans, and declared war on DEI and trannies. This is infinitely better than Kamala and not voting for it was retarded.
Yes, Trump is in bed with the Jews and may advance Greater Israel. Everyone at that level is in bed with the Jews. Kamala would have done the same thing except worse and faster and btw climate lockdowns. Should we ask Santa Claus for something different? While your children get inducted into the tranny cult and raped?
Nick Fuentes has made absolutely no material improvements in anyone's life in the United States, and he will continue to make absolutely zero material improvements for the rest of his life. He's good at livestreaming, not fighting. He is an entertaining gay minstrel. Nothing more. (except possibly a fed)
*anyone claiming Biden's deport numbers were higher because of turnaways at the border is a complete moron.
I wouldn't take that bet on Walsh. He has been saying some things lately that hint that he is closer to Candace Owens than Ben Shapiro as far as identifying the core problem.
So you are the perfect mark for Nick, the kind of person who only sees his "based" takes carefully curated to make him seem wise without knowing his massive history of faggotry, hypocrisy and selling out.
Literally everyone, on their own in this thread had the same perspective that these guys were suspicious and coordinated, without needing an e-daddy to tell them. Get your own opinions and thought processes instead of offloading the work onto a femboy fucking beaner.
words words words. amazing how vitriolic people get at the slightest mention of nick haha
can you inform me briefly on his hypocrisy and selling out? i'm genuinely interested because i can see he is a little sensationalist and hypocritic at times
Nothing I say will apparently be brief enough for your attention span, I fear.
Nick's complaint falls apart when Walsh has never said anything of the sort lmao. You're as big as faggot as he is. Kirk and Psobic tweeted in response to Walsh
he pulled receipts (old walsh tweets) on last night's show