There are 57 recommended vaccines before the age of 18 by my count.
What is the probability that you experience at least one "severe adverse reaction" if all vaccines have the same severe allergic reaction incidence as these new ones? The math is pretty easy. It is just 1-(1-p)^57, or 1-.97^57 = .82. An 82% chance that you will have at least one vaccine hospitalization from these demons.
I'm all for being alert and aware to the risks... Your math makes a bad assumption, though: A lot of these vaxxes use similar tech (part of their other financial pyramid scheme is renewing patents by adding one tiny thing to an existing thing, then insisting that is used instead of the now-public-domain one), so those who get fucked once, are much more likely to be fucked again, making two counts (the baseline math you're using), but one victim (the arguably more important stat).
5% is too high on its own. I play D&D, those 1's roll all the time. You don't need to fall into a fallacy of incidents == victims like the 2010s college rape epidemic alarmists.
You are making a worse assumption: That repeated does have no risk. That is just false and the Covid -19 "vaccine" shows it. The first dose might not show a problem, but the second or third can.
so those who get fucked once, are much more likely to be fucked again, making two counts (the baseline math you're using), but one victim
that is covered by the "at least one vaccine hospitalization". The math doesn't care if it is more than one. Any number of hospitalizations makes the statement true. Think about the complementary event: that none of the injections cause a severe reaction. That event is one minus the probability of a reaction, to the power of the number of trials for independent events. There is no reason to assume that vaccines in different categories have the same "tech". The payload is tailored to the disease, and the rest of the solution is just a saline solution and some preservatives and pH balance. Similarly, as mentioned above, there is no reason to assume that vaccines get safer somehow the more you take them. While the second and third does for a single vaccine are not independent, they are not risk free, and 3% chance of a reaction is a fine guess.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/child-adolescent-age.html Archive: https://archive.ph/7d8JG
There are 57 recommended vaccines before the age of 18 by my count.
What is the probability that you experience at least one "severe adverse reaction" if all vaccines have the same severe allergic reaction incidence as these new ones? The math is pretty easy. It is just 1-(1-p)^57, or 1-.97^57 = .82. An 82% chance that you will have at least one vaccine hospitalization from these demons.
Never forget: DDD.
Good info. Thanks.
I'm all for being alert and aware to the risks... Your math makes a bad assumption, though: A lot of these vaxxes use similar tech (part of their other financial pyramid scheme is renewing patents by adding one tiny thing to an existing thing, then insisting that is used instead of the now-public-domain one), so those who get fucked once, are much more likely to be fucked again, making two counts (the baseline math you're using), but one victim (the arguably more important stat).
5% is too high on its own. I play D&D, those 1's roll all the time. You don't need to fall into a fallacy of incidents == victims like the 2010s college rape epidemic alarmists.
You are making a worse assumption: That repeated does have no risk. That is just false and the Covid -19 "vaccine" shows it. The first dose might not show a problem, but the second or third can.
that is covered by the "at least one vaccine hospitalization". The math doesn't care if it is more than one. Any number of hospitalizations makes the statement true. Think about the complementary event: that none of the injections cause a severe reaction. That event is one minus the probability of a reaction, to the power of the number of trials for independent events. There is no reason to assume that vaccines in different categories have the same "tech". The payload is tailored to the disease, and the rest of the solution is just a saline solution and some preservatives and pH balance. Similarly, as mentioned above, there is no reason to assume that vaccines get safer somehow the more you take them. While the second and third does for a single vaccine are not independent, they are not risk free, and 3% chance of a reaction is a fine guess.