Women haven't been able to select their sexual partners freely for 99.9% of human history. Their mating instincts have never evolved beyond fucking the biggest and most violent ape in the jungle.
I was listening to a podcast the other day reviewing a book about historic mating rituals & sexual repression in tribes.
Rituals such as sending your fiancée to be vetted by living with her MIL first for 6 months.
Or marriage rituals by having the father demonstrably & publicly break the hymen by hand in front of the entire tribe in a ritual to demonstrate purity with blood flow. Where the tribe would either cheer at the sight of blood or stone the woman to death if she was found to be unchaste.
The book, which I forgot the name & author, posited that no civilization survives 3 generations once female sexual suppression is lifted.
It's almost as though all these isolated & very different cultures knew what they were doing when they in parallel put societal guardrails on female mate selection.
That sounds very interesting. I'd love to listen to that podcast or read that book.
The book, which I forgot the name & author, posited that no civilization survives 3 generations once female sexual suppression is lifted.
I've heard similar sentiments before various times and it's hard not to acknowledge that it's very plausible at the very least. The implication is always that we're next in line as a society, but I fear that our technological sophistication and level of abundance relative to those past failed societies is so high that it could keep our society going in a sort of zombie, semi-collapsed state. Or perhaps "death" as a society this time simply entails being overrun with third worlders who eventually take over.
Dimes and Judas dissect the book “Sex & Culture” by JD Unwin. A deep anthropological study of tribes from across the world, he correlates sexual restrictions with advanced social development posits a thesis that monogamy is essential to harness the energy of a populace to achieve innovation and growth.
Women haven't been able to select their sexual partners freely for 99.9% of human history. Their mating instincts have never evolved beyond fucking the biggest and most violent ape in the jungle.
I was listening to a podcast the other day reviewing a book about historic mating rituals & sexual repression in tribes.
Rituals such as sending your fiancée to be vetted by living with her MIL first for 6 months.
Or marriage rituals by having the father demonstrably & publicly break the hymen by hand in front of the entire tribe in a ritual to demonstrate purity with blood flow. Where the tribe would either cheer at the sight of blood or stone the woman to death if she was found to be unchaste.
The book, which I forgot the name & author, posited that no civilization survives 3 generations once female sexual suppression is lifted.
It's almost as though all these isolated & very different cultures knew what they were doing when they in parallel put societal guardrails on female mate selection.
That sounds very interesting. I'd love to listen to that podcast or read that book.
I've heard similar sentiments before various times and it's hard not to acknowledge that it's very plausible at the very least. The implication is always that we're next in line as a society, but I fear that our technological sophistication and level of abundance relative to those past failed societies is so high that it could keep our society going in a sort of zombie, semi-collapsed state. Or perhaps "death" as a society this time simply entails being overrun with third worlders who eventually take over.
Link to Blood Satellite podcast on YT
Not really sure why, but their YT clips are always several months behind their actual podcast.
The book review clip appears to be from Feb, Full Episode #287 on their website.
It's a great podcast BTW, though I mostly listen to their clips from time to time.
Two Canadian good ole boy racist dissidents who are very well read and very interested in the collapse and new systems to come.
TBH, I consider myself reasonably intelligent and I find their content a little too high brow for me, always reviewing history & big ideas.
Thank you!