People will disagree because you said if but you're correct. Just because they're an ethno socialist doesnt change that they're socialist. Fuentes and Spencer are good examples and both are also actually gay
This is why I have no problem with Ethno-Nationalism outside of the US, and outside of Socialism. Why should a nation not argue for it's own political structure? If the nation feels best served by a state without an ethno-nationalist government, then so be it, but if they chose to be represented by such a state, it is their choice. Ireland right now is trying to re-embrace Ethno-Nationalism, but since their Nationalism was carried by Progressives at the turn of the century, they've been betrayed by the very Socialists who came up with the idea in the first place. It is the Ethno-Nationalist Socialists of Wales, Scotland, and Ireland who are directly demographically replacing their own nations, on purpose. If the German National Socialists had survived World War 2 they would have the same policies as the German Green Party (partly because the Green Party was founded by several members of the NSDAP).
What you have in Ireland now are non-Leftist, non-Progressive, Nationalists trying to re-capture a Nationalist sentiment that was hijacked a hundred years ago.
Well, which ethnicity are we talking about, and don't give me a 'race'. Black isn't an ethnicity. White isn't an ethnicity.
I'll accept American Ethno-Nationalism in the US, just as soon as you accept ethnogenisis actively takes place in the US, and as soon as you admit that the slur "Amerimutts" means that we have a multi-racial ethnicity, like Brazilian Confederates. Americans are not made from one and only one ethnic group, unless that ethnic group is American.
People will disagree because you said if but you're correct. Just because they're an ethno socialist doesnt change that they're socialist. Fuentes and Spencer are good examples and both are also actually gay
This is why I have no problem with Ethno-Nationalism outside of the US, and outside of Socialism. Why should a nation not argue for it's own political structure? If the nation feels best served by a state without an ethno-nationalist government, then so be it, but if they chose to be represented by such a state, it is their choice. Ireland right now is trying to re-embrace Ethno-Nationalism, but since their Nationalism was carried by Progressives at the turn of the century, they've been betrayed by the very Socialists who came up with the idea in the first place. It is the Ethno-Nationalist Socialists of Wales, Scotland, and Ireland who are directly demographically replacing their own nations, on purpose. If the German National Socialists had survived World War 2 they would have the same policies as the German Green Party (partly because the Green Party was founded by several members of the NSDAP).
What you have in Ireland now are non-Leftist, non-Progressive, Nationalists trying to re-capture a Nationalist sentiment that was hijacked a hundred years ago.
Why not in the US? Hart Celler wasn't that long ago. Why don't we have the right to repeal it and go back to ethno-nationalism?
Well, which ethnicity are we talking about, and don't give me a 'race'. Black isn't an ethnicity. White isn't an ethnicity.
I'll accept American Ethno-Nationalism in the US, just as soon as you accept ethnogenisis actively takes place in the US, and as soon as you admit that the slur "Amerimutts" means that we have a multi-racial ethnicity, like Brazilian Confederates. Americans are not made from one and only one ethnic group, unless that ethnic group is American.