3k were T34s and KVs. So almost as many as Germany had in total during the beginning of the invasion.
And those T34s were used almost exclusively at the Finnish war until operation Barbarossa was enacted and they got moved south. In the invasion of Poland the tanks used were the shitty T-26s, they were so bad hundreds of them became inoperable during the invasion from mechanical failure. If we want to play pretend that volume equals victory in WW2 then at least make a decent argument.
And how is the total war production relevant to pre-war numbers?
Maybe because WW2 was the greatest leap in technological innovation from all fronts. Are we pretending WW1 tanks like the T-26 are even comparable to a panzer 1 let alone a panzer 4?
What kind of argument are you trying to make?
That you’re lying out your ass about Germany “preemptively” striking Russia. If you want to throw number about Russias “military expansion” by pretending WW1 biplanes and tanks were a “massive military expansion” then you’re intentionally obfuscating reality. America lend leased more actual tanks and planes than what they had when Germany invaded them.
I mean I know what you're doing but let's just reiterate your argument.
Stalin didn't plan on invading Europe because his military was actually quite terrible and without the US/Brits help he would've lost the war. The amassed military equipment before the war doesn't matter because technology progressed so fast during the war and more shit was produced during war.
Stalin didn't plan on invading Europe because his military was actually quite terrible and without the US/Brits help he would've lost the war.
He was already invading parts of Europe. Your argument was he was planning on invading Germany. Why try and obfuscate that again faggot?
The amassed military equipment before the war doesn't matter because technology progressed so fast during the war and more shit was produced during war.
Yes, this is proven beyond any shadow of a doubt, it’s why Germany managed to outperform other countries.
Goddamnit, nigger. You should debate Destiny.
You should try making an actual argument, your pathetic ass tried to compare a panzer to a T-26… you’re trying to scam so hard I’m shocked you don’t open each line with a “please Saar” you sniveling pajeet faggot.
He was already invading parts of Europe. Your argument was he was planning on invading Germany. Why try and obfuscate that again faggot?
You're debating so dishonestly it just becomes too obvious what you're trying to do. Although perhaps you're just an idiot. In that case I'll apologize.
Yes, this is proven beyond any shadow of a doubt, it’s why Germany managed to outperform other countries.
Again. Either you're deliberately debating dishonestly or you're just an idiot.
Just in case you're truly just an idiot. How a war developed after it started has no bearing on the reasons why it started. Cause y'know people usually can't foresee the future. If I try to stab you but you realize it and beat the shit out of me it doesn't change the fact that I wanted to stab you.
3k were T34s and KVs. So almost as many as Germany had in total during the beginning of the invasion.
And how is the total war production relevant to pre-war numbers?
What kind of argument are you trying to make?
And those T34s were used almost exclusively at the Finnish war until operation Barbarossa was enacted and they got moved south. In the invasion of Poland the tanks used were the shitty T-26s, they were so bad hundreds of them became inoperable during the invasion from mechanical failure. If we want to play pretend that volume equals victory in WW2 then at least make a decent argument.
Maybe because WW2 was the greatest leap in technological innovation from all fronts. Are we pretending WW1 tanks like the T-26 are even comparable to a panzer 1 let alone a panzer 4?
That you’re lying out your ass about Germany “preemptively” striking Russia. If you want to throw number about Russias “military expansion” by pretending WW1 biplanes and tanks were a “massive military expansion” then you’re intentionally obfuscating reality. America lend leased more actual tanks and planes than what they had when Germany invaded them.
I mean I know what you're doing but let's just reiterate your argument.
Stalin didn't plan on invading Europe because his military was actually quite terrible and without the US/Brits help he would've lost the war. The amassed military equipment before the war doesn't matter because technology progressed so fast during the war and more shit was produced during war.
Goddamnit, nigger. You should debate Destiny.
He was already invading parts of Europe. Your argument was he was planning on invading Germany. Why try and obfuscate that again faggot?
Yes, this is proven beyond any shadow of a doubt, it’s why Germany managed to outperform other countries.
You should try making an actual argument, your pathetic ass tried to compare a panzer to a T-26… you’re trying to scam so hard I’m shocked you don’t open each line with a “please Saar” you sniveling pajeet faggot.
You're debating so dishonestly it just becomes too obvious what you're trying to do. Although perhaps you're just an idiot. In that case I'll apologize.
Again. Either you're deliberately debating dishonestly or you're just an idiot.
Just in case you're truly just an idiot. How a war developed after it started has no bearing on the reasons why it started. Cause y'know people usually can't foresee the future. If I try to stab you but you realize it and beat the shit out of me it doesn't change the fact that I wanted to stab you.